Saturday, July 28, 2007

"USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program" said the ad

"Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program"???

What is this Scientology MUZZLED DESTIM PROGRAM ?

Well, it may possibly be a part of the infamous Introspection Rundown.

You see, Scientology not only tries hard to silence it's critics, it has a history of driving to suicide or killing it's members who become mentally unstable. So what is a cult to do? Create the Muzzled Destimulation Program" as a preliminary step to the of the original Interspection Rundown? It makes sense since they were sued for the use of the original in the sad and preventable death of McPherson.

Scientology kills particularly when the tactics used violate basic human rights to life and prevent proper medical help.

In this way, it killed Lisa McPherson, Dale Bogen and so many others.

I don't make this stuff up. The evidence is out there. Been going on for years. Google "scientology kills" or the above names names and see for yourself.

As a result of the criminal investigation of the church related to Lisa McPherson's death, the Church of Scientology created a binding contract with members and it is one of the stipulations within the contract that one can be held against their own will pay for and receive the cult's service called the Introspection Rundown:
Scientology's barbaric treatment of members in lieu of some proper medical attention - the kind scientology rejects.

Here's a quote from a stellar article about this 'contract'as published in Razor Magazine "Church's Lethal Contract written By Dr. David S. Touretzky and Peter Alexander:

"Imagine a church so dangerous, you must sign a release form before you can receive its "spiritual assistance." This assistance might involve holding you against your will for an indefinite period, isolating you from friends and family, and denying you access to appropriate medical care. You will of course be billed for this treatment - assuming you survive it. If not, the release form absolves your caretakers of all responsibility for your suffering and death. Welcome to the Church of Scientology."

Well, the contract in question is apparently in active use by the cult. Take a look at the most condemning piece of evidence for it, an advertisement for a job opening over at the Razzline, a Scientologist run cyberspace place for scientologists (SCN's) only to post news, ads and such. The ad is asking for help to muzzle a troubled 21 year old. Because it concerns an unnamed young man in distress, I ask that you say a prayer that the proposed action against him is prevented. Here's the ad:

USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program

Published July 26th, 2007 in CLASSIFIED and JOB OPPORTUNITY.
From: Dan Dempster
USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program

I’m urgently looking for someone who is experienced to do a muzzled destimulation program with a 21-year-old male. May take a number of weeks. Large male preferred. $800 per week plus all expenses.
Beautiful location on a 25-acre waterfront property on a large lake.

Call me right away.

One becomes a member of this RAZZLINE by following the rules in the Membership section. Here are some but not all of the rules:
"How to Sponsor a friend: To sponsor someone you need to inform me of the following things: - That you know the person you’re sponsoring personally - as in you’ve met them face-to-face.- You know them to be a SCN in good standing."

So it is clear that a scientologist named Dan Dempster is looking to provide this terrible violation of essential freedom right to a young man in distress in Los Angeles, CA as I write this. How many others have survived (or not survived) it?


Unknown said...

I was hoping that there would be confirmation that a "muzzled destim program" really is what it certainly sounds like:

Forced unlicensed therapy on an adult by unqualified individuals based on the writings of a hack sci-fi writer, validated by an outrageous and legally questionable "Lisa Clause" in a Scientology services contract. (Large male preferred.)

Technical Specialist Courses - Scientology Training

Okay, maybe this really is something harmless, and maybe the people involved have someone that they are concerned about and are trying to do their best in a difficult situation. And maybe they feel that they know best and that medical doctors don't. I do hope that Dan and others take the time to think about what they're doing and to stop and "check the map" in case they got lost somewhere along the line.

This isn't about a "win" for the critics, or handling a flap for Scientology. Right now, this is about an individual and I hope things go well for him.

Because I don't want to have to read another set of these:
Lisa McPherson's baby-watch logs

Another question to ponder is: How often does this occur that there are individuals experienced in the muzzled destim program?

Anonymous said...

Hey Android,
Have you heard about the horrific murders that happened to a $cientology family in Australia? If not here's a Link.

Anonymous said...

Android, as you now know,
Over on alt.religion.scientology usenet group, Gerry Armstrong wrote a reply to this, quoting L. Ron Hubbard:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:19:56 -0700, Jimmy Cricket
xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>First, look at the context of "muzzled" coaching here:


>and here:


>Muzzled Auditing.
>While some forms of auditing require a certain amount of chattiness
>and conversation, for the most part a "muzzled" approach is preferred,
>in which the auditor says two things and two things only: giving the
>command/question and acknowledging the answer with "thank you". In
>1972, Hubbard said stating the "model session patter" in this manner
>"always gets the best results". In some forms of muzzled auditing, a
>non-sequitur answer is to be ignored or simply nodded to, with the
>question then asked again. In others, the auditor says the word
>"flunk" and re-asks the question. To help enforce Hubbard's "model
>session patter", David Miscavige ordered Patter drills be instituted
>to help student auditors memorize it. Some, such as former
>Scientologist Robert Dam, have criticized this method.

>Muzzled destim is related to this:

>Not quite the same thing though.

Muzzled destim is described in HCOB 20 February 974R
"Introspection RD Additional Actions"
An additional step to the rundown has been found necessary, especially in the case of a psychotic. This is the responsibility Step. [...]

In the case of a psycho it is necessary to tailor the Introspetion RD steps to the pc, instead of following it as a rote sequence at the risk of running unreading items on the pc. On any pc this is deadly. In a psycho it is pure dynamite. [...]


When you clear a cannibal what do you have? Experientially you have a cannibal. His experiential track is such that he’s been a cannibal for ages. That’s how he’s handled life and people around him, that’s what he knows how to do. This person is unaware of his responsibilities to other dynamics and is unfamiliar with proper behavior and responsible actions towards others. In the case of an SP, he has been busy destroying others for so long that when he’s somewhat cleaned up on this he does not know what else to do or how to act.

It’s rather pathetic, actually.


With someone in a psychotic break, it is necessary to isolate the
person for him to destimulate and to protect him and others from
possible damage. While in isolation the person receives the
Introspection RD done flawlessly on a short-session basis, gradiently winning and gaining confidence. Between sessions the muzzled rule is in force. No one speaks to the person or in his hearing.

There comes a point where the C/S must decide to release the person
from isolation. To do this the C/S must know that the person can take
responsibility for his actions as regards others, as well as toward


The C/S’s action is a direct comm line to the person by notes. The
person is provided with paper and pen to reply. The C/S must determine the person’s responsibility level. Example: “Dear Joe, What can you
guarantee me if you are let out of isolation?” If the person’s reply
shows continued irresponsibility toward other dynamics or fixation on one dynamic to the exclusion of others damaged the C/S must inform the person of his continued isolation and why.
Example: “Dear Joe, I’m sorry but no go on coming out of isolation yet. Your actions threatened the survival of hundreds of people indirectly and 6 families directly by burning down their houses. You are unaware of the effects this could have had and still only concerned about your own welfare. You must hate the human race quite a bit.” [...]

— L. Ron Hubbard

[End Quote]

© Gerry Armstrong

Anonymous said...

How could someone like you lie soooo much!!! Don't you feel bad about your lies? I'm sorry you have such a pittyful life and you are suffering soo much. But that doesn't give you the right to tell lies to people. To anyone who reads this I recommend them to try for themselves and investigate for themselves and don't belive the BULLSHIT this filthy person wrote on this blog.