Thursday, November 22, 2007

Larry Brennan Interview Transcript (Scientology Corporate Fraud?)




Interview of Larry Brennan, on November 8, 2007

by Tom Smith, host of WXYB, 1520 am

Hillsborough Community College, Indian Rocks Beach, Tampa, Florida

TS = Tom Smith

LB = Larry Brennan

TS: Welcome to the Edge. I'm you're host Tom Smith. Many of us are not informed of the inner workings of the Church of Scientology, founded by the American writer, L Ron Hubbard. The facade maintained by organized Scientology uses celebrity poster boys and religious pretense. Today on our program we are going to strip that image aside, and look at a few things that really go on.

Our guest is Larry Brennan who has held a number of positions with organized Scientology. He's been the director of all Scientology legal operations outside a litigation area, worldwide from mid 1976 through mid 1981. As the legal Branch One Director of the Guardian's Office Worldwide, he held similar positions prior to that in the United States Guardians Office. He's worked on organized Scientology's corporate evolution in 1981 through 1983 and presented to the leader of the Scientology organization, David Miscavige the planning for that. He was in charge of the Scientology Special Unit and Watchdog Committee, which was an oversight committee designated as member X in 1982 and 1983 working directly with David Miscavige on Scientology's corporate, legal and other external affair matters.

Welcome to the Edge, Larry.

LB: Oh thanks, Tom. It's real good to be here.

TS: Shall we start? Can you kind of give us some background about your involvement with the actual Scientology corporation?

LB: Well, yeah sure. I think you summarized it very well. Bottom line, I was in the Guardians Office in the United States Guardian's Office in 85, late 84, early 86 where we were in charge of the corporate work, corporate structure, tax status, et cetera, of Scientology organizations. Got to work under Hubbard on a number of things then, which may come up on this program, including the move of Flag, the Flagship to Clearwater, Florida and how that was done undercover. We covered a little bit of that on the program we did before.

Then I went to the Guardian's Office Worldwide at Saint Hill Manor in East Grinstead Sussex, England. Was there for about five years on running the legal outside of the courts and then went and did what they call their, "corporate sort out " and worked a Special Unit. Worked directly with "DM" - David Miscavige. This was a period of time when he was supposedly in Author Services and he has said in courts and various declarations that he was not involved in running the Church then, but he was, and I worked directly under him, but.

By way of a summary I suppose, I would say that Scientology, L Ron Hubbard is the acknowledged founder of Scientology, and he always ran it when he could, despite many statements that he had retired, or what have you, as the executive director, he continued to run it. And he ran it until Miscavige ran it, underneath Hubbard in 81-82 and then finally Miscavige took over on Hubbard's demise. But, despite a religious, caring, maybe decent front, put out by the organization it was really was built and run and controlled using constant lies and deception and what I consider fraud, as well as outright brutality and abuses of countless others. And this is just a summary and we can go into details there shortly.

It was run like this at one time by Hubbard via Miscavige, that's when they did the corporate evolution in 81 - 82. But really in my opinion here, and this is just my opinion, having worked with Miscavige and seeing the Hubbard orders at that time. Miscavige was a very poorly educated, I don't think he had been through high school when he was a kid. And he worked directly under Hubbard who at that time was certainly not at his best - he was very brutal, the type of orders he was given about taking over sectors and dealing with people and spitting on people and all that.

And I think Miscavige was very impressionable and he learned how to operate under Hubbard like that and on Hubbard's demise that's all Miscavige knew was that sort of brutality. It was sort of like, you know, he saw this abuse he learned by abuse and he's now the big abuser. Anyway, he took it to an entirely new level and he controls you know, an empire, financial empire worth certainly at least, hundreds of millions of dollars if not billions. He completely controls it as a dictator and that's basically a summary of what it was, but what I can go into to whatever degree you'd like as how it got to that point, and what changed and you know, so on and so forth. But I'd like to get some background behind it, but that's sort of a summary of it.

TS: OK. Well, basically can you kind of give us some background about what you did, your roll in the whole a ?

LB: Corporate?

TS: Right

LB: OK, well, in 1981 the Commodore's Messenger Organization acting on orders from Hubbard, and as carried out by "DM" - David Miscavige, actually ended up taking over the Guardian's Office and I was in the Guardian's Office Worldwide at the time so I was asked to go out to report to California for an urgent matter. So I went to Los Angeles and found out that they needed, that the people who were working on a Corporate Sort Out mission to corporately put right the affairs of Scientology were no longer there and they needed somebody else to run it and I ended up being the person to run what's called a "Mission," as a missionaire.

And so what we did is, well first of all, to give you a little bit of background. Just in the months - in the year prior to that, David Miscavige ran a mission called Mission Corporate Category Sort Out, it's known kind of as "MCCS" and that mission was allegedly to set the corporate affairs straight for Scientology and it had people, Gerry Armstrong was on it, he was going to get Hubbard's biography written. Laurel Sullivan was working on the corporate matters. But David Miscavige ran it. And the problem was, David was incompetent, and like I say, he didn't even have a high school education and he would not listen to the advice of the missionaires like Laurel and Gerry. Like for example, they were pointing out the things that were just fraudulent about Hubbard running the organization and yet Miscavige was trying to lie saying that he wasn't and they were trying to really get it so that Hubbard really didn't run it. So it could be run by the hierarchy of the Church and Miscavige didn't want that. Gerry Armstrong was telling them that what he needed to do, was stop all the lies about Hubbard - about his phenomenal accomplishments in life and the military and education and all that, they were totally false. And David Miscavige would not listen to that. And Hubbard was directly involved with it and I had many of Hubbard's orders at that time even in respect to that mission.

Later on, Miscavige testified in court that Hubbard was not involved, but he was. And the bottom line is that mission broke up because they wouldn't do what Miscavige and Hubbard wanted them to do and I ended up on a mission, instead of MCCS it was called Corporate Sort Out. To make along story short, we came up, the problem was, the apparent problem was, that most of the eggs of Scientology corporately were in a corporate basket of a corporation known as the Church of Scientology of California. In it was organizations like the Commodore's Messengers Organization, the Executive Director International's Organization, and major revenue-producing arms like Flag and Advanced Organization of Los Angeles, and American Saint Hill Organization, et cetera.

And what was happening was that there was alot of litigants under attorney Mike Flynn and others that were suing Scientology for various abuses and what have you. And, it was getting at that, corporate you know, big eggs in the basket organization. Really, the Corporate Sort Out was in a large part done to insulate and hide those assets from litigants. Now Miscavige specifically testified in court in the next decade, that was not the purpose, but it was really was one of the big purposes of it. The other one was to protect Hubbard and Miscavige, like the senior people in Scientology so that they could continue to run it without being legally liable for it.

So it was very complicated to say the least but that's what it was about. But what happened is, alot of us on the corporate mission thought that basically we could get it sorted out and there could be a new evolution in Scientology management. It really wouldn't be run like it shouldn't be run, it really wouldn't be money going, like millions of dollars were going to Hubbard under cover and that could stop.

What happened is, we spent millions of dollars, we spent a long time, we got a corporate planning together. I brought it to Miscavige myself and sat with him for a good five hours and answered his questions. And to summarize it all out, because alot of people here aren't going to be corporate people. There were four things that was going to be organized Scientology. the Church of Scientology International, a new corporation would actually manage Scientology. Not Hubbard, not Miscavige, it would be the Church of Scientology International. And in the Church of Scientology International would be the Commodore's Messenger Organization International, the Executive Director International's office. The real management, so that would be cool. They would have contracts with all the other Churches of Scientology, what have you and everything would be real smooth.

The second thing is, we created a body called Religious Technology Center. And it really was not supposed to be management, and it would focus on as it were, the "pureness" of Hubbard's technology covered by the trademarks. OK, that was fair enough. And then the third thing was, money could still go to Hubbard not by cover up and lies as was done before but actually by illegally defensible channels like royalties for his books and what have you. And lastly, Author Services would be created a company called Author Services International or Incorporated and it would be truly an organization that does what it says which is make money on Hubbard's fiction works, and would totally be separate out from the management of the Church of Scientology.

So really with those four things it would be a whole new evolution in Scientology's corporate status and management. It would be honest and straightforward and that's what the corporate sort out was designed to do. But the problem is - it didn't do it, it just made it look like that was the case. And, for example, and I don't want to bore anybody on this but as an example - prior to the corporate sort out, in the years prior there were several million dollars funneled to Hubbard through a phony corporation called Religious Research Foundation.

Now the Mission Corporate Category Sort Out, those guys were trying to figure out how to make that legally defensible, retroactively, like oh my God! What a mistake. What a horrible, thing, that this money, cause Hubbard was putting out issues to all scientologists that he never benefited from Scientology, he never took any money. But the fact is, he was taking several million dollars while staffs were starving. I mean

TS: Yeah

LB: He would advise and write policies that International Management take all the money they can off the top of all the organizations whether they were in Germany or the US or whatever, so if the organizations could not spend them, but then alot of it ended getting funneled to him. So, while that was the thing that happened prior to the corporate sort out and we thought the corporate sort would prevent that from happening in the future, just the opposite happened. For example, in the year after the corporate sort out with Miscavige running things. If you look at testimony from the Julie Christofferson-Tichbourne case, testimony by Homer Shomer and affidavits that were in a case after that, you will find that in 82 alone DM funneled over forty million dollars - not two million like before - but forty million dollars to Hubbard. He in every way, the corporate integrity that was made to appear real - in the new structure - was completely untrue.

He in every way ran organized Scientology through Author Services. And he did that through running the top dogs like he ran the Watchdog Committee chairman, Mark Yeager, at the time, and Watchdog Committee Finance, another Mark. He ran me as Special Unit. He ran Steve Marlow as Religious Technology Center. So he would have meetings over at ASI, secret meetings that we would go to and he would basically tell us who's going to be running the Church, who's not going to be running the Church but it was - it turned out that the corporate structure that was done was made to appear impenetrable and very defensible but it was hiding the same level of fraud even worse than prior to that.

TS: Yeah

So anyway, I could go on with a great deal of detail, but I think that probably one example that explains it the best is - after the corporate structure was done, right, and so now I'm a executive in CSI, in the highest authority body, which is Watchdog Committee, right? And so are seven or eight other people. Well, Miscavige is over in Author Services which is just supposed to just be handling Hubbard's fiction works. But in reality he's ordering us what to do in that we have to send money to Hubbard - not for the fiction works - but for Scientology works. And, it was a weekly demand. In that time period in 82 when forty-million dollars got funneled. There was calls from Miscavige and his people - every single week - a millions got to go - a half a millions got to go. Work out whatever the significance is. He's threatened to strangle people if they didn't do it. I've even gone to the International

TS: This is, Hubbard or is this Miscavige?

LB: This is Miscavige. I've even gone, and this time period where later in courts he said he was Author Services right, not involved in running the church?

TS: Yeah

LB: In that exact time period I have seen him at the churches International headquarters. I've seen him take a top WC member, punch him hard on the mouth. Another one strangled down to the floor. Another one slapped down. Because they wouldn't listen to him and Hubbard. And all this time, Miscavige is saying in court, "I'm not involved in the running of it, we're all separate corporations. Hubbard's not involved." Well, it's totally a lie. Because I was on Watchdog Committee. I had Hubbard's orders every single week. And every week we got orders from him. What to do, and including what to do about non-Hubbard technology in churches. What to do on the corporate stuff and all that. And a it was regular and ongoing

TS: So, if you didn't do those things

LB: He was the enforcer.

TS: Yeah. If you didn't do those things, he would punish people with felony violence?

LB: Oh, absolutely. I mean there were people that came to me, that were busted. That asked if they were going to jail - they've been told they're going to jail and I'm just trying to tell them their not going to jail but they're told they're going to jail. What happened is, there's some things that have been in Jon Atack's book for example, "A Piece of Blue Sky" where he talks about the brutality of taking over the mission network. That is absolutely true. Everything I've read in there, and I've read that whole section is absolutely true and in many cases, and in fact, an understatement. He would regularly use the brutality that he learned - from Hubbard at that time - and he didn't trust anybody. Like little things that haven't been posted, like for example, that are not known - In early 81 I was on the first WISE mission, to incorporate WISE in Lichtenstein.

And the person I was taking my orders from was Hubbard via telexes. And I did incorporate the first WISE Corporation in Lichtenstein which we didn't use but Hubbard said, "the name killed the PR" because it was WISE Limited. But in any event, the significance of this was - 1) Hubbard was running it at the time that Miscavige said Hubbard was not. 2) I know what the real purpose of WISE was and it was nothing that had to do with all the grand goals and beautiful things stated in WISE promotion. The real purpose of WISE was right from Hubbard.

He completely distrusted public scientologists and thought they were going to rip off organizations and they had to be handled with terminatedly and at once. So part of the handling was to set up an organization that would police, corral, control them and even take money from them and keep them off of the organizations lines. And the other part of the handling was to use the newly created finance police, to put people in jail. And put heads on pikes. So Hubbard had ordered that and DM was carrying that out. And Wendell, and if you wanted to see testimony on this, that's very real, there is Don Larson worked under Wendell Reynolds on the In-Finance police, and he did many brutal acts of extortion and that on scientologists and he's even admitted it. You can find it on the Web, his own video, you know where he's apologizing for having done it. Well, I've seen him do it and others do it. But DM says, Miscavige says, as I said later in court, that he and Hubbard were not running things which they were. And they took over from the GO because the GO was brutal and bad and violated Scientology policy and all that. But in actual fact

TS: His wife was running the GO. Mary Sue Hubbard

LB: Hubbard was running the GO

TS: OK

LB: Mary Sue, his wife was known as the Controller, and she was prior to that known, her title was, "Commodore's Staff Seven." I mean, GO - "Commodore's Staff GO." And so, they had to change that name because Commodore was Hubbard, and it made it clear that Hubbard was running Mary Sue who was running the GO. So they changed to Controller so that it would look like she was controlling the GO and not Hubbard but he was. As a matter of fact, when the GO got busted on the FBI raids for just incredible crimes, like trying to, you know from the horrible abuses on Paulette Cooper, to abuses on other people, to infiltration of the US government - all the things that were done - those were done under Hubbard orders. And what happened in the months that followed that FBI raid - is the Guardian's Office and the Commodore's Messenger Organization went into full "all handses" of scores and scores of people doing full time vetting just to get erased from the files all of Hubbard's orders and so on and so forth that were behind these criminal actions. So the thing about Scientology is, corporate structure has never meant much of anything. It's always been camouflaged, it's always been Hubbard when he was competent enough, at least to control it, and then it was Miscavige.

TS: So Miscavige began his career as Hubbard's henchman.

LB: That is absolutely correct and he did it through what was called an, "All Clear Unit" which allegedly was to make it all clear for Hubbard to come out of hiding, but what it did is it broke down into two confidential Special Units. One was called, "Special Project" and that's what DM stated himself and that evolved into being Author Services. Another part of that unit what became known as, "Special Unit." That's the one I ended up running the Special Unit IC. And that went into the Church of Scientology International. But that was how the control was executed. It wasn't on any organizing boards or anything like that, it was Miscavige ran both of those units. To give you another example, how clear cut - for one thing, it's very clear Hubbard lied about his past and his accomplishments and all that and it's very clear that DM has as well. But in my opinion, I think the average judge is going to find that DM's lies became legal perjury and a crime.

And the reason I say that is, he's testified in court with these lies, and he's written declarations under penalty of perjury and filed them in like, the Wollersheim case and other cases in the 90's. For example, here are a couple of little quotes, right. This is from Miscavige under penalty of perjury. He goes, "neither RTC nor I have any corporate authority under any Scientology church including CSI." He says, "the Sea Organization is a religious fraternal order, like the Catholic priesthood with its own rituals and traditions that exemplify and foster members shared and deeply held commitment to the religion. It confers no corporate or ecclesiastical authority. Sea Org members are staffed in many churches of Scientology across the globe. Any authority they have in the church entity that employs them derives from their position in that church structure and not their honorary status in the Sea Organization. "He's got hundreds of quotes like this that are absolutely false. Like he had one - one he's even made a mistake on that he's proven he's a liar. And like for example in one, Section fifty-seven of a Declaration of a Wollersheim case, he says, "I was not involved in that restructuring, but I'm aware of the events that led up to it." And he was talking about the 1981 corporate evolution and restructuring.

TS: Yeah

LB: So, from his declaration he's absolutely not involved. But then if you go to a website called Scientologytoday.org/corp/rtc2 they're praising David Miscavige. They said, here's a quote: "Mr. David Miscavige has worked tirelessly to protect the religion. He authored the early 1980's reorganization of church corporate and management structures that have given the religion years of sustained growth and stable leadership."

So, they can't even keep their lies straight. And also, he didn't author it. I brought it to him. He blew his opportunity of it, of doing it a year prior to that because he couldn't understand it. So he didn't author it but like Hubbard, he starts to claim all these things. But he's even making statements now that are showing as lies, things that he made under penalty of perjury in court cases, so its kind of, it's kind of crazy. And I don't know if you want me to continue to give examples, but I can give you examples for ten straight hours on this.

TS: [laughter] Unfortunately, we don't have that kind of time, it would be great. We'd have to take quite a few breaks I think. Allright.

LB: I think, bottom line is, it goes on and on and on. And honestly, I mean, this is probably, bring somebody inside the Corporate Sort Out for example, on a very simple level that proves this point. When we broke up the Church of Scientology of California - Let's say, just for the Flag area which is now in Clearwater, Florida. We created three new corporations that were relevant to that area - the Church of Scientology International, which is the mother church. That would have a few representatives down there in Florida.

The Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization which would be most of them. And then of course we kept the Church of Scientology of California alive with a few people there. Well, it was us, the missionaires under Miscavige who decided who was going into which corporation. And, even they're quote, unquote "board members" the people we picked to be that, they didn't even know who was going on. We would just say - this one's going to be in this corporation, this one would take the orders from that one. And we were setting up all the window dressing. In fact, we pulled a bunch of students off courses at Flag and sent them all around the world to get the churches to sign the new agreements with the new mother Church of Scientology International.

he local churches for the most part didn't even know who their board members were, they never met. And they weren't allowed to read the agreements. I myself was sent my Miscavige to "Pubs," the New Era Publications in Copenhagen, Denmark, to get them to sign the new royalty contracts with Hubbard. They didn't even get to read them. So, it's not just that, maybe there's a little bit of an out corporate integrity, it's a one hundred percent controlled by Hubbard and then Miscavige with just a whole bunch of camouflage put around it to make it look like it's not.

TS: So these boards of directors, these various corporate entities are - it's all a sham? Am I right?

LB: Oh, absolutely, it was all under the Guardian's Office. I mean, the Guardian's Office held undated resignations of them per Hubbard orders. But the thing is, the big change that Miscavige says happened you know, took over the GO and it's a new era - it's a new era allright. He kept the same Hubbard orders that you know - that in 1982 alone - more scientologists - this is staff and public were abused in what they call a, "gang bang sec check" where a bunch of people go and scream at them on a "meter" and all that.

TS: Well it's kind of, Soviet-style Nazi interrogation.

LB: Oh, absolutely. The more that happened and the more scientologists were declared, beaten and abused and sent to penal camps in that one year under Miscavige than the total of the fifteen years under the Guardian's Office Worldwide.

TS: OK, we should qualify that. Now you said penal camps. What are you specifically referring to?

LB: Primarily what's called the Rehabilitation Project Forces and that's something that Hubbard created and Miscavige used alot and people would be sent to these, where they would be housed for the most part with - there are so many stories on the Internet that people can read of people who have escaped them or left them for one reason or another, and they're telling their stories. But for the most part people lived in squalor, they worked unbelievable hours. They got very little sleep. They were indoctrinated all the time. They had to run around, they were spit upon and in cases where they were up by Miscavige. And it was just a horrible hell.

What shows you, how disingenuous organized Scientology under Miscavige is, that relates directly to this is, for example they have an organization called the International Association of Scientologists. It's nothing more than a bank account to get membership money out of people who want to continue to do services. Well what happens is, they put out a very beautiful, glossy Magazine called "Impact." I mean it's a really high quality in that, it's as good as National Geographic. You know the color photos, and the quality of the paper.

Well, a recent one, I think Issue 115, some earlier this year, came out acknowledging how organized Scientology is behind the universal UN Declaration of Human Rights. And they went and listed all these incredible human rights. You know - freedom of association, of family, and being able to voice your opinion and all this other, and freedom of movement. And in that magazine there's maybe one, maybe two pictures of Hubbard. But there's like fifteen pictures of David Miscavige - smiling, happy. But right when you read that magazine, you have to realize that at same time - there are hundreds of people that have all those rights denied them - on the Rehabilitation Project Forces around the world. Like it's not in some areas. Like the German government for example, won't allow the church to do a Rehabilitation Project Force. Like a camp.

TS: Yeah

LB: At the same time you're reading about these wonderful, grand, beautiful things by organized Scientology, they're violating all of those rights. On their very own people. Many of them, they're own top management people, who were very good people, had very good intentions, were sacrificing their lives to do something they believed in - and you could say maybe it was silly of them, whatever - but they were putting it all on the line, and they'd be the very people you know, sent to these penal camps. They would be slapped. They would be beaten. They would be humiliated. They would be made to divorce. Made to have abortions. A "clear planet" is Scientology's says they want. A planet run by Scientology. You know David Miscaviges version, could be an Orwellian nightmare of you know, families must disconnect from each other, there penal camps for anybody who doesn't tow the line.

TS: It sounds like it's kind of a totalitarian -

LB: I truly understand. I had to go to Germany for a few days and find this out for myself with the German government.

TS: Uh huh.

LB: But I see now why they are so much fighting organized Scientology.

TS: Yeah

LB: Because they've lived through Hitler.

TS: Yes.

LB: They've lived through the whole Naziism, and seen it sweep and take over their country and they've seen the horrid camps and abuses and all that and all, and what, and in my opinion they rightly with an Scientology as organized by Miscavige right now is the beginning, the nucleus of that.

TS: Yeah. This -

LB: Of the Nazis, of the like, my God if these people got big enough, how many people would be broken up from their families,

TS: Yeah

LB: how many people who don't toe the line would be sent away to camps.

TS: Yeah

LB: You see, Miscavige gets very vicious even in his public promotion, there is a protion he's had I've been at seminars where he talks about the total obliteration of psychiatry and how he's going to see that that's done. At the same time, Hubbard has written that a person who has been on Psychiatric lines is not qualified to be in Scientology, so these people would just be sent to camps. Like OMG, can you imagine everybody they consider mentally ill is sent away to penal camps where, you know, whatever happens that would be very ... nasty to say the least!

TS: Yeah it sounds a whole lot like the Soviet gulags, reeducation camps, uh, punishment type camps, people are put through hard labor And given a minimum amount of ah, food just to sus- barely sustain them and indoctrinated in, uh, the dogma of uh, in that case the party, the Communist party but in this case uh, the Scientology organization and this-this forced abortions thing where they actually - some young owmen who, they get pregnant there at -- if they're at one of these bases or Sea Organization International Base or whatever, they're uh, they're not allowed to have children.

LB: Well one, one after another has come out and told that story, you know on the internet and otherwise. It's all over the place, it is so widespread. Um. You know, um... Let me tell you something. The way he gets away with this is not only by having a corporate structure that's very hard - I mean that would cost you millions to penetrate, right?

TS: Uh-huh.

LB: But he will scream, 'Oh! You're religious bigots if you're speaking out against me and I have my rights because this is ecclesiastical policy what we're doing, and we're entitled to our beliefs' and they'll position themselves with every decent religious organization that was ever prosecuted at any time in history and say that now Scientology is being prosecuted.

TS: Yeah.

LB: But think about it here. I really believe in religious freedom, but I've been around to Germany, to the West Coast, to the East Coast, uh, I've met a lot of the people that they consider religious bigots from the Religious Freedom Watch site and so far every single one of them has been a very decent person. Here is - here is an example of when he ways you cannot look into us because this is ecclesiastical religious policy and scripture and you're, you're a bigot if you do, well let's read just a little bit example of these scriptures. Here, for example if you don't mind I'll just take 2 minutes.

TS: OK

LB: Ah, One is a Hubbard Policy he wrote in 1955 called Dissemination of Material. Here's the quote:

"The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly." Another quote, another part of their ecclesiastical policy and scripture, Department of Government Affairs Policy of 15 August 1960, "Make enough threat or clamor to cause the enemy to quail. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Don't ever defend, always attack." Um, and then he goes on with many, many of these, but I'd say probably the most famous one that was ever used against him which they said was cancelled and I'll show you how it's not was Fair Game. For what was called a lower condition, like if you're not doing well in life?

TS: Yeah

LB: Um, at one level you get what's called a suppressive person order, that's somebody they consider is out to destroy Scientology, or you're an SP, right?

TS: Right

And it's called Fair Game, and you may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. may be tricked, sued lied to or destroyed. Now you will see Scientology representative, 'oh, that was cancelled, it was misunderstood,' and all that stuff. Well, let me read you the cancellation. Ah, Just a little over a year later, the policy called Cancellation of Fair Game came out and it said, um, the practice of declaring people Fair Game will cease. Fair Game may not appear on any ethics order. It causes bad public relations. This policy letter does not cancel any policy on the treatment or handling of an SP. [laughter]

TS: So - so

LB: It's just saying you can still trick, sue, lie to or destroy people, you just can't call it that.

TS: In other words, he cancelled it as a policy but not as a practice.

LB: Correct. And he cancelled as using the name. And think of this, - I mean, if you go to the very first policy of what is meant by Fair game, as in what does it even mean, he says - get this - and he's putting a whole bunch of people in this classification, like thousands of these people were put into this classification by David Miscavige alone in 1982, right?

TS: Yeah

LB: But here it is. By Fair Game is meant: without rights for self, possessions or position. And no Scientologist may be brought before a Committee of Evidence or punished for any action taken against a suppressive person or group during the period that person or group is Fair Game. And it goes on and on, but the thing is there are children -little children who want to leave Scientology and take off without approval and are declared suppressive persons so they're Fair Game. Uh, I mean, just this last week, this last week--last ten days alone, I have heard of two more people who have had their children write to them to disconnect from them saying that they're not allowed to talk with their parents anymore because their parents um, will either not do Scientology or who post in a forum that is critical of Scientology.

TS: Yeah.

LB: But I'm just saying there's thousands and thousands of people like this, um, that this applies to. It is a very inhumane organization, to say the least.

TS: Yeah. Well there is a profiling tactic that, that's used in the Scientology organization, too, and they have this information on the suppressive person, they list 12 characteristics. However when they label somebody and the labeling is done by anybody in the organization authorized to do it, it's done only by that person authorizing it, there is actually no reference made to the actual characteristics. And going a level deeper than that, Hubbard came up with these characteristics, uh, not by any, uh, scientific research or anything that was published and peer reviewed, it was basically his, uh, his idea. His whole- Those were his notions. And uh, there's actually if you look at the definition, the, well, the accepted definition in the field of psychology of a psychopath, it's ah, quite different from what in Scientology is called an anti-social personality or a suppressive person. Uh, I think that is an interesting point as well, but when they label somebody suppressive person it's because they - somebody in the organization, ah, wants to uh, derogatorily label that person and uh subject them to persecution.

LB: Yeah. Boy, that's, that's totally true.

TS: [laughter]

LB: I agree with you there. It's - it is incredibly sad, I mean it's unbelievable. I mean, I don't even want to - I'm not even going to bring up details of this but I've seen it right within my own family and I've seen it - I remember watching on TV, um, a former spokesman of the Office of Special Affairs on CNN saying 'oh, we are - we bring families together and we do not - disconnection is not a policy that we do' and like a week later [chuckles] my--one of my best friend's daughters disconnects from him. And I remember being called by a member of the Commodore's Messenger Organization and me being threatened if I didn't disown my daughter who had left staff without permission. And I - I told him words I cannot say on your radio program?

TS: Yes.

LB: It's just rampant and ongoing. It's certainly a scary world that they are building, too, but, but, the thing to me is they are - they are so obviously organized Scientology lying about the controls and the structure and their policies that I believe something can be done about it and the average person can do something about it and I mean, I have a, I have a few suggestions, and like for one thing, if you're a government, like for example we know in Belgium there the prosecution there is asking for approval to go ahead and prosecute on some very serious crimes based on a ten-year investigation.

TS: Yeah.

LB: And many other countries in Europe are looking into Crimes by organized Scientology, and my suggestion to them is, you know, whether it has to do with medical practice without a license or just false imprisonment, or all the many other myriad of horrible things that are done under the name of their ecclesiastical policy realize what they're really dealing with is an international foreign criminal organization that truly controls it. It's one thing...you're going to bust some poor guy in Belgium, or Germany, Hamburg, wherever for doing some abusive act to somebody else locally, is fair enough, but there's just going to be another guy doing that there next year if you don't get to the root of what is behind those abuses, and what's behind those abuses are organized Scientology and their interpretation of Hubbard policies to oppress and suppress people that are, you know, that they view to be enemies which is a very large part of the population. And, um, so one, I believe they should take their investigations beyond you know, just the local scene and realize that they've got to deal with the international organization. Two, I found out by a government representative in Germany, Ursula, actually a wonderful person over in Hamburg, that the state department is after, is on their case all the time about, you know, why are you harassing Scientology, what has Scientology done wrong, and the state department representatives have no idea what Scientology has done that's wrong, yet Ursula has to live with it.

TS: Yeah.

LB: She made a suggestion which I really support and that is, if everyone in the US for example, you could do this in any country, but if everyone in the US who has been abused and in particular, lets say you've had family ripped apart or children taken away from mothers or fathers or vice versa, whatever, by organized Scientology, write a one- page, simple letter to your congressional or senatorial representative letting them know this is what really is the case. Don't embellish it, don't lie, just tell the truth.

TS: Yeah.

LB: And through the senate and through the congress, they will often communicate to other departments like the IRS, the state department, the whatever, and, and that is how you can get information known and spread about in government circles in a way that will impinge and really the beauty of this is that people are just trying to get out the truth.

Now the other thing, which is absolutely amazing to me is I've been reading a lot of legal documents and court cases that Scientology has filed where they're using their using their IRS exemption recognition from 1993

TS: That's a 501(c)3

LB: Oh, that's a whole other five shows right there, Tom, just talking on that one.

TS: OK, Allright

LB: But they use that, for example, to say, "Oh, the IRS has done the most extensive investigation that they've ever done on anyone, and this proves that we're all beautiful and wonderful, and our corporate integrity is perfect, and all this stuff, it doesn't prove, they've used it in cases like Wollersheim's cases and that, where they've said the IRS has shown that our corporations are separate, and they don't run each other, and and in fact, it hasn't shown anything like that. For one thing, how they got their exemption, you know, is up to investigation, but, there's nothing in the rules of exemption about one corporation controlling another. If they were both considered exempt, for example, then they're exempt. It doesn't matter who controls it, so it doesn't prove who controls anything, whatever they got from the IRS.

Secondly, I think it proves the opposite, I mean, look at it. Within days of meeting with the IRS, they could put up a tax compliance committee made up of Miscavige and seven or eight or nine or ten top Sea Org members who could control all the auditing, financial representations for hundreds of organizations, maybe 120 or however many organizations. Well, wait a minute. Now they can also speak for the 120 organizations immediately? I mean, doesn't that tend to imply they do have a legal control over those organizations? So what's funny is, the very thing they used to try and say, to confuse people and say, "This proves that we're separate, and we're distinct, and there's no liability running up the lines from one corporation to another, actually it proves the opposite. It's mind-boggling how boldly and how blatantly they'll lie about something.

TS: Yeah, the thing is, most people assume good faith, and they, and they, particularly with a religious organization, they're going to assume that they have some kind of public interest at heart, or at least some good intention there, overall good intention, and, but what we're seeing here from this group is, there's a facade on the outside that uses celebrities and religious cloaking, but on the inside, it seems like, it seems to be running itself like an unscrupulous business.

LB: Well, yeah, and I would agree with that, and it's not only with respect to who they consider enemies, but it's their own people. I've seen it, and people have testified to this since then, since I've been in there, but they'll take every dime they can from all the local organizations they control, which includes Narconons, and education groups, Scientology churches and missions, and they'll take 90% of alltheir revenues if they could, and I know. I set up... Part of the corporate evolution was to set up trusts, like a films trust, to pull out five or ten percent of quote unquote churches' weekly revenues to pay for the films that they got. But, whatever it was, there was always some significance to...because Hubbard believed that the local organizations could not be trusted with not spending all the money, so international management had to take it from them. And when I presented the corporate solutions to Miscavige for approval, at a time period when he said he was not involved with it at all, and then in fact he did approve it, he had to be the final approval. When I presented it to him, most of his questions were on how could he continue to control it, how can we take mostly all of their money? And, so, my point in saying this is that, it isn't just their quote unquote enemies that get mistreated or abused, it's their own people, because many of the people on their own staffs are getting what? Nothing, five dollars a week, thirty dollars a week, they have children. They can't clothe their children properly, they're not fed properly, not, they don't have a medical program, they have no retirement program, it's absolute hell. There are people who have been thirty years plus in their Sea Organization who right now are in penal camps and about to be released into the world with no health program, no retirement program, nothing. No other skills, and they could care less. So, I don't know anybody who isn't, ultimately as a public, who isn't ultimately hurt by these people.

TS: Yeah, this is actually, the staff members often have to work second jobs and, they, struggling to make ends meet there, because they're not getting paid very much, because the money is being evidently, as you say, siphoned off, and these people are really struggling just to get by. They work long hours, they're subject to rather unusual, let's just say, unusual penalties, to be polite, and it's just, it's kind of a bad deal. After they decide to leave, or in some case they have a contract if they're a regular staff member, they don't really have any savings, anything really put aside because you really can't, well, you have to work a second job just to pay your rent, usually they rent, usually they don't own a house, pay the rent and food and things like that, if they have kids, I mean it's just, it's quite a burden on somebody and there's nothing that they really get for it.

LB: Well, I agree, and it's just a sad thing, and that's why I'm saying, you know, the things that could be done, is if you've got a story, write it. Send it to your Congressional reps if you've been beaten by this guy, let me tell you something, I've been informed by a major reporter, that within two weeks of today, major national press is ready to release details on Miscavige's beatings of people. It's just two more people besides myself who'll come forward and go on the record. That's how close it is, there are one or two other persons who simply just tells the truth and lets their name be known can start letting the world know what this guy really is like and what he's really doing, and at no point are any lies and embellishments wanted or called for, it's that close, there's so much we could do right now.

There's the FactNet questionaire, there's some 140 questions asking many, many details of, that involve criminality and all that, involving organized Scientology and Miscavige. There's answering those things. There's testifying, I know that governments like Belgium and so forth, or I don't know, but I believe they're gonna need to speak with certain people who have information that'll help with the prosecution, and I think being willing to testify to help them is another good thing. If you've been beaten, file a complaint. That's it. Simple as that. There is no reason that a person has to stand there and be spit on, humiliated, beaten and have to just not take it. Some people aren't speaking up because they don't want to destroy what they consider to be their church. Well, I'm saying, if that's what their church is all about, it ought to be destroyed. But let's focus on, you don't have to take on, fight all of Scientology or be against every single principle of Scientology to point out that, you know, David Miscavige beat you. I'm just saying, tell the truth. If you have relevant information to the questionaires, if you have relevant information to testimony, if you can talk about the disconnections that happen, if you can be freely open with the press about this, education will come out, the light of truth will shine, and, you know, the problem will take care of itself. Anyway, that's my opinion, and I think the truth is what's needed and the truth is what can really make a big difference.

TS: Right, I mean when one person commits physical violence like that against another, these people should make a report to the sheriff or police department and see to it that the criminal investigation is carried out. It's just, these people should learn not to take that kind of abuse, that's just horrendous.

LB: That's right! And I'll also say as a message, in case any of these people ever hear this, but if you are in organized Scientology right now, let's say you're an OSA person and you're listening to this as you're about to report on me, and figure out how to fair game me, or sue me or whatever for Miscavige, let me tell you something. Take a look around the internet, and what I'm saying here, I'm willing to explain this to anyone, if any Scientology celebrities want to contact me, I'm willing to give them absolute details on everything that I've said here so that they can have the truth available to them, and I'm just telling you. Miscavige, he has the control there, he can beat up people, and seize the accounts and all that, because everyone's afraid of him. But he, in RTC, he truly can't control CSI. Corporately, it only takes two people to remove another director. Or two trustees to remove another trustee. You can stand up any time, if you're in organized Scientology, and simply throw him out. And, I'm just telling you, let's just start with the truth, and let a lot of it be known, and if that happens, you know, maybe some of our governments will start doing their duty and investigating some of the crimes allowed to go on within this organization.

TS: Larry, we're running out of time, I'd actually, I mean, I know you can talk for hours and hours more on this. We've been interviewing Larry Brennan, who was in a high position in the Church of Scientology for a number of years in the Guardian's Office, which is now known as the Office of Special Affairs. That's the arm of Scientology that handles intelligence, litigation, internal legal, public relations, any other functions there? The Guardian's Office used to handle finance, but...

LB: That's right. They also used to handle social coordination, which was like the Narconon, and the education programs like, Applied Scholastics I think, they're saying that's now done through ABLE, and not so much OSA. That's where some of those functions went.


TS: Okay. But that's actually Office of Special Affairs, which is OSA, basically administers ABLE, these social groups though, they oversee them.

LB: There isn't any local group that has the freedom to make their own decisions that's involved with the Scientology structure, and it all is ultimately centrally controlled. It's just that, one is going to have to pierce the corporate veils legally to make Miscavige and people like that responsible, but it's there and they control it, every one of them, doesn't matter which organization they are in, they're centrally controlled.

TS: Yeah. Larry, really appreciate your being on the program today, we'd like to have you back in the future, there's a number of other topics we can kind of branch off from. We've been talking about various abuses, personal abuses as well as different corporate abuses within the church. of Scientology itself, and these abuses actually go beyond what one would normally think of in terms of what a religion should do, and it appears that there's, the structure of this organization really is more on the ken of an unscrupulous business rather than a bona fide religion. This is something that we need to be aware of as citizens, something we need to really look at, a number of governments in Europe are actually taking action, really understand what's going on, don't approve of these abuses and are taking action. Hubbard did say, "Never fear to hurt another in a just cause," and he also used the term, "The greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics." These statements are both euphamisms for the principle of the ends justifies the means, and that principle has been used throughout history to justify all sorts of atrocities. These atrocities need to stop. I'm Tom Smith, I'm the producer and host of The Edge, we'll be back again next week with another interesting guest.

Photo: Courtesy of Lermanet.com, Larry Brennan
Transcription courtesy of volunteers: Fiesty, Maggie Council and Barbz Warr

Thanks to Hillsborough Community College & Hawk Radio, Tom Smith with The Edge, and former Scientologist / Scientology high ranking executive, Larry Brennan.

For more information about Scientology, visit www.lermanet.com www.xenu.net and
Google Usenet group: alt.religion.scientology

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

A Church Accounting: Sen. Grassley...Pls Investigate the Church of Scientology, Too

A church accounting
A Times Editorial
St. Petersburg Times, Clearwater, FL
Published November 12, 2007

Joyce Meyer calls herself a woman of God, and maybe she is, but Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican, wants to know how Meyer can justify spending $23,000 in tax-exempt religious contributions for a marble-topped commode. Meyer's church, Joyce Meyer Ministries in Missouri, is one of six Christian ministries Grassley is investigating for possible abuses of their tax-exempt status. Another of Grassley's targets is Without Walls International Church, a controversial megachurch based in Tampa.

Politicians should be careful when delving into religious matters, but Grassley has raised some legitimate issues about enforcement of tax laws. While religious institutions have constitutional protection against certain taxation, they are also expected not to abuse their special status. In fact, while Grassley is looking into such matters, he should add the Church of Scientology to the list.

Scientology's shameful past includes a 25-year legal and psychological campaign against the IRS to be recognized as a tax-exempt religion. Scientology tactics included a criminal conspiracy in the 1970s to bug IRS offices, which led to 11 convictions of church members including founder L. Ron Hubbard's wife. Scientology filed dozens of lawsuits against the IRS, hired private investigators to dig up dirt on IRS employees and financed other IRS critics.

In an unprecedented concession in 1993, the IRS dropped its long-held position that Scientology operations where commercial, and granted the organization tax-exempt status as a religion. Mysteriously, that decision came after then IRS Commissioner Fred T. Goldberg Jr. held an impromptu private meeting with top Scientologist David Miscavige. Goldberg and the IRS still refuse to discuss their decision or release details of the settlement even though there is no legal obligation for them to remain silent. Perhaps Grassley could shed some light on what happened in that private meeting.

While federal law gives great leeway to recognized religions to collect money without paying taxes, there are some clear limitations. A religion's income and assets cannot be used to benefit church insiders beyond their normal compensation, and must be used for charitable, educational or religious purposes rather than to enrich individuals.


So when Benny Hinn, leader of World Healing Center Church in Texas, gives himself a salary of more than $500,000 a year, buys a $10-million seaside mansion and vacations at church expense in jet-setter hot spots, Grassley has a right to ask a few questions. MinistryWatch.com, an independent religious watchdog group, reported those financial excesses (and more) by Hinn, whose church got a failing grade for financial transparency. Two other ministries on Grassley's list also received an F from MinistryWatch.com: Kenneth Copeland Ministries in Texas and Creflo Dollar Ministries in Georgia.

The issue is not only one of legality but also fairness. Every tax dollar a ministry improperly avoids paying is a dollar added to everyone else's tax bill. And the amounts are huge. In the four years leading up to its victory 1993 over the IRS, Scientology reported revenues of $1.1-billion, which have undoubtedly grown since then.

There is no reason to believe that Grassley, an independent-minded conservative, will carry his investigation too far or question legitimate tax-exemptions of the many religious organizations that use their money for charitable work. In fact, Congress could boost the credibility of religious giving by exposing those who abuse people's generosity for personal gain. http://www.religionnewsblog.com/19868/prosperity-gospel-2

Read the comments to the original piece. You'll see how quickly James and Terrio, Scientology's posting minions, were the first comments in here and quite a few other articles critical of Scientology. That's because they were tipped off in advance. Scientology has planted members on the staff of The St Petersburg Times, as they have with other organizations and government agencies. It's all part of Hubbard's plan to take over the world..... yet the media, which Scientology hates, continues to chew them up and spit them out. Thank God for that.
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/11/12/Opinion/A_church_accounting.shtml

But, there is much more to the story of how Scientology gained it's tax exempt religious organization status. It was, once again, a topic of discussion over at usenet group alt.religon.scientology recently:

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Out_Of_The_Dark wrote:
I was skimming the blogs and came across this blog article about a recent St Petersburg Times Editorial piece where the editor suggests that Iowa Sen Grassley add Scientology to the list of churches to audit...... editorial
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/19868/prosperity-gospel-2

To make sure it was a valid article, I went to the SPTimes site and looked in the archive for the Nov 12 piece. Sure enough, it was there, along with some very good comments only the critics of scientology will appreciate, lol! Thank you St Petersburg Times!!

Here's a 'Fair Use Exerpt' of the original archived text found here:
http://tinyurl.com/2y5sd8
--------------

From: "Android Cat"
Android Cat wrote:


"The I.R.S. has refused to say whether Mr. Goldberg had an unscheduled meeting with Mr. Miscavige. Mr. Goldberg, who left the agency in 1992, has declined to comment."

WTF?

I think I'm missing a tag on an article that wonders if the *current* (1993)
commisioner signed off on it. Look under:
http://home.primus.ca/~ronsharp/FrontCiteTW.html#IRS

You betcha I've spent time tagging IRS-related articles!

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/11/12/Opinion/A_church_accounting.shtml *foomp* into the FrontCite pipeline.

("In an unprecedented concession in 1993, the IRS dropped its long- held position that Scientology operations were commercial, and granted the organization tax-exempt status as a religion. Mysteriously, that decision came after then-IRS commissioner Fred T. Goldberg Jr. held an impromptu private meeting with top Scientologist David Miscavige. Goldberg and the IRS still refuse to discuss their decision or release details of the settlement, even though there is no legal obligation for them to remain silent. Perhaps Grassley could shed some light on what happened in that private meeting.")

The weirdness is that Fred *wasn't* the IRS commisioner in 1993. It seems to be the last thing he signed-off on as he headed for the door after resigning and there was confusion about who authorized it at the time. There's a few retroactive questions that Fred should be answering.

-- Ron of that ilk.


Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Android Cat"
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:42:51 -0500
Local: Thurs, Nov 15 2007 1:42 am
Subject: Re: SPTimes Editorial Nov 12, 2007 'A CHURCH ACCOUNTING' "......while Grassley is looking into such matters, he should add the Church of Scientology to the list."

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/11/12/Opinion/A_church_accounting.shtml *foomp* into the FrontCite pipeline.

("In an unprecedented concession in 1993, the IRS dropped its long- held position that Scientology operations were commercial, and granted the organization tax-exempt status as a religion. Mysteriously, that decision came after then-IRS commissioner Fred T. Goldberg Jr. held an impromptu private meeting with top Scientologist David Miscavige. Goldberg and the IRS still refuse to discuss their decision or release
> details of the settlement, even though there is no legal obligation for them to remain silent. Perhaps Grassley could shed some light on what happened in that private meeting." )

The weirdness is that Fred *wasn't* the IRS commisioner in 1993. It seems
to be the last thing he signed-off on as he headed for the door after
resigning and there was confusion about who authorized it at the time.
There's a few retroactive questions that Fred should be answering.

Ron of that ilk.
-------
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Android Cat"

Here it is:

Scientologists Granted Tax Exemption by the U.S.
By STEPHEN LABATON,
Published: October 14, 1993
Note that Fred Goldberg isn't even mentioned in the entire article (which is
why it doesn't have a tag for Fred.)

==
Mr. Keith said the group was notified of the decision on Oct. 1 and that it
followed a two-year review of financial statements and other information
provided by the organizations about their structure and purposes. He would
not say whether the final decision had been made by the new Commissioner of
the Internal Revenue Service, Margaret M. Richardson, who would normally
have to approve any large settlement.
==
Frank Keith is still there at the end of 1997 when the agreement is leaked.

--------

Out_Of_The_Dark Nov 17, 3:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Out_Of_The_Dark
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2007 3:06 pm
Subject: Re: SPTimes Editorial Nov 12, 2007 'A CHURCH ACCOUNTING' "......whileGrassley is looking into such matters, he should add the Church of Scientologyto the list."

Yes, the SpTimes editor named Fred Goldberg instead of Margaret M. Richardson on this point but in all reality, it was probably Goldberg who was the one who signed off on the initial clearence of the agreement, most likely after being intimidated and harrassed and fairgamed. If I were Fred and I was in that situation,m I would turn
the matter over for completion to my replacement, who probably knew little to nothing accept that Fred Goldberg did all the prep work with getting the application back to the Tax Exempt unit and just giving the giving the formal acceptance to Richardson for final signatory.

That takes attention off Goldberg, shuffles the case into the package of work a new director is given and the issue gets lost in transition. I am certain this was the intent.

I cannot imagine what kind of dirt they found on Fred Goldberg but whatever it was, it swiftly changed the direction of the IRS in denying Scientology it's tax exempt status, in spite of Hernandez losing the supreme court ruling in Hernandez v IRS on deductability of donations. That made the IRS more powerful than the United States
Supreme Court. Granting Scientology 501(c)3 tax exempt status was a hugh error in judgement which in time will come back to haunt the IRS. That time may be not. I sure hope so.

Thanks for keeping such a great resource.
http://home.primus.ca/~ronsharp/FrontCiteTW.html

IRS: Scientology is tax-exempt religion
October 13, 1993
Wayne Garcia, St. Petersburg Times:

The Internal Revenue Service says the Church of Scientology and its myriad entities don't have to pay federal income taxes, ending a 40- year battle with the controversial church over its purpose and methods of dealing with opponents, which included burglary and intimidation." [..]

In the past week, the Internal Revenue Service issued 30 "determination letters" that exempted 153 Scientology churches, missions and corporations from paying federal corporate income taxes, said Frank Keith, an IRS spokesman.

"I have invested a whole number of years in this and I can say I'm disappointed if this is the final ruling," Mayor Rita Garvey said.

"It's a profit-making organization preying on the needs of people looking for help."

"I think it's a license to steal," said Gabe Cazares, a former Clearwater mayor who was a target of church harassment."

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sptimes/access/51775819.html?dids=51775819:51775819&FMT=FT&FMTS=ABS:FT

Rest in peace, Gabe Cazares

Mary McConnell

_____________________________________

Michigan Church of Scientology Staff Member Gets Aggressive With a FOX NEWS Reporter

Contractor Trying to Get Paid By The Church of Scientology

FOX 2 NEWS Detroit writes:
"A contractor is caught in a business battle over religion. He is struggling to get the Michigan Church of Scientology to pay its bill for air conditioning work performed in June. FOX 2's Bill Gallagher worked to get some answers and got stonewalled."

It's bad enough that some Scientology churchs routinely avoids paying bills.....just ask any of their past vendors, but to send an aggressive staff member out to attack a reporter for reporting on one of those unpaid obligations? Now that's bad.

Take a look at this news clip. Notice how the scientologist deals with the reporter. He actually grabs the microphone from the reporter and, thankfully, the reporter firmly and calmly put the man on notice stating that what he was doing was an act of agression. It certainly looks that way.

Contractor Scuffling with Church of Scientology

Last Edited: Thursday, 25 Oct 2007, 9:46 PM EDT
Created: Thursday, 25 Oct 2007, 9:46 PM EDT


You can also see the video at RooTV

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO NARCONON

Alternatives to the infamous ' Narconon' drug rehabilitation program? You bet!

Often I get emails in which readers of the internet have concerns or bad experiences with Narconon, or have read testimonials about anothers bad experiences with Narconon and are asking where one can find a good drug rehabilitation facility to help their their suffering loved one.

Since I am not familiar with the particulars of other programs that are available, I refer them to the federal Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration Drug Rehabilitation Program Referral Hotline, along with links to the SAMHSA online Facility Locator and drug information pages there.

This federal referral line will be able to help anyone locate other facilities besides the few Narconon's that exist in the USA. This includes detox and 'step down' facilities close to home.

There are many many facilities in the USA.The Facility Locator shows those facilities nearby that hold appropriate accreditations (or lack of them, as in the case of Narconon), and whether the facility takes insurances, has bilingual staff and so on. This Facility Locator has been very helpful for me in being able to help other's whose loved ones need a safe and medically sound program.

I urge everyone to bookmark this page and keep the information at hand in the event of oneday needing an appropriate facility to send someone to:

Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration
http://www.samhsa.gov

SAMHSA Substance Abuse Information for the Public
http://www.samhsa.gov/treatment/treatment_public_i.aspx

Substance Abuse Information for Individuals:

You can also call SAMHSA's Toll-Free Referral Helpline
at 1-800-662-HELP (1-800-662-4357)

Are you looking for a treatment facility in your area?
Go to SAMHSA's Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator:
http://www.findtreatment.samhsa.gov/facilitylocatordoc.htm

Go to "A Quick Guide to Finding Effective Alcohol and Drug Addiction Treatment"
http://csat.samhsa.gov/faqs.aspx

Substance Abuse Information for Families
http://www.samhsa.gov/Treatment/treatment_public_f.aspx

SAMHSA's sister agencies at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have more public information:

National Institute on Drug Abuse
http://www.nida.nih.gov/
National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/

Other Important Links For Those Considering Narconon

NarcononVictims: A Forum for Victims of Narconon
www.narcononvictims.com

Stop-Narconon :Protecting the Vulnerable from Narconon/Scientology
www.stop-narconon.org

Narconon Exposed: Drug Rehab or Scientology front?
www.narconon-exposed.org

www.ripoffreport.com ( search for Narconon or Scientology)

Mary McConnell
http://free-from-scientology.blogspot.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

HOW BAD IS NARCONON?

The Luthy case against Narconon, soon to be settled, read as the the majority of complaints all lumped into one case. You have to read this to see just how bad Narconon is ( courtesy State of New Mexico, County of Bernalillo Clerk ).


STATE OF NEW MEXICO
COUNTY OF BERNALILLO
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ENDORSED
FILED IN MY OFFICE THIS
JAN 09 2007

FRED LUTHY and
PHYLLIS LUTHY, [signed: Juanito M. Duran]
CLERK DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiffs,

v. No. CV 2007 00228

NARCONON STONE HAWK REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.,

Defendant.


VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT, UNFAIR OR
DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES BREACH OF CONTRACT AND UNJUST
ENRICHMENT

1. Fred Luthy and Phyllis Luthy are residents of Bernalillo County, New Mexico.

2. Defendant Narconon Stone Hawk Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (“Narconon”) is a Michigan corporation with its principal place of business in Battle Creek, Michigan.

3. The acts and events giving rise to this complaint occurred in Bernalillo County, and the harm resulting occurred in Bernalillo County.

4. This court has jurisdictions over the subject matter and the parties, and venue is proper in this forum.

General Allegations

5. In early July, 2006, Fred Luthy contacted Narconon about the possibility of Narconon providing treatment for Mr. Luthy's son, John Luthy.

6. Fred Luthy spoke with Doug McGarry (“McGarry”), who represented himself as an intake counselor for Narconon. McGarry gave Mr. Luthy some general information and took Mr. Luthy's phone number.

7. In the weeks that followed, Fred Luthy and Phyllis Luthy (“the Luthys”) received no less than six (6) phone calls at their home in Albuquerque, New Mexico, from McGarry.

8. During these conversations with McGarry, he told the Luthys that he was a former student of Narconon and represented it as an appropriate treatment option for their son, John.

9. The Luthys informed McGarry that John has a serious drug dependency issue and was not a willing participant for the Narconon program. Phyllis Luthy informed McGarry on several occasions that John would not want to remain at Narconon and would be very difficult to control.

10. McGarry assured the Luthys that Narconon could adequately address their concerns and that if they could get John to the program in Michigan that Narconon “knew exactly how to deal with” someone like John.

11. On more than 5 occasions Phyllis Luthy reminded McGarry that John was very difficult and would likely not want to remain at the Narconon center. Each time McGarry assured Mrs. Luthy that once John was there the Narconon staff could assure that John would stay and be treated.

12. Also, the Luthys received no less than six (6) phone calls at their home in Albuquerque, New Mexico, from a woman who identified herself as Desiree, represented herself as former student of the Narconon center and assured the Luthys that the Narconon program would be able to effectively treat their difficult, drug addicted, son.

13. Upon information and belief, Desiree received the Luthys' contact information from, and was encouraged to call them by, a representative of Narconon.

14. The Luthys were repeatedly assured by representatives of Narconon that, once John was received at the Narconon Center, it was a guarantee that they would be able to treat him.

15. McGarry informed the Luthys that the “tuition” for the Narconon program was $23,500.00 and that an account would be opened for John in which the Luthys could deposit money for his incidentals while at the center.

16. On, or about, August 25, 2006, Fred Luthy's bank wired $25,000.00 to Narconon for the cost of the tuition and $1,500.00 for John's account.

17. On, or about, August 25, 2006, John Luthy arrived at the Narconon center to begin treatment.

18. Upon information and belief from August 25, 2006 until August 30, 2006, John Luthy received no treatment and was merely housed at the center as he became increasing uncomfortable, irritated and impatient while undergoing the symptoms of drug withdrawal and craving.

19. Upon information and belief on, or about, August 30, 2006, John demanded that he be released from the center and Narconon had him driven to a nearby motel and left him there.

20. The Luthys were informed that John was terminated from the program for “violating the rules contained in the student handbook” and that, despite the fact that they provided him no treatment and merely housed him for four days, Narconon would be retaining the entire $23,500.00 tuition.

21. Despite several demands Narconon has refused and failed to return any portion of the tuition and has further refused to return the $1,500.00 deposited into John's account.

COUNT I
(Fraud in the Inducement)

22. The Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-21 of their complaint.

23. Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with Defendant to provide drug treatment services for their son.

24. Plaintiffs' willingness to assent to the terms of the agreement, and the agreement itself, was caused by the nateria1 fraudulent misrepresentations of Defendant and its agents.

25. Plaintiffs have been damaged by the Defendant's actions.

26. Defendant's conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and/or recklessly committed, with wanton disregard of Plaintiffs' rights.

COUNT II
(Breach of Contract)

27. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-26 of their complaint.

28. The agreements and representations made by the parties formed a valid contract between the Plaintiffs and Defendant.

29. Plaintiffs performed all of their obligations under the contract.

30. Defendant breached the contract.

31. Plaintiffs have been damaged by the Defendant's breach.

32. Defendant's conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and/or recklessly committed, with wanton disregard of Plaintiffs' rights.

COUNT III
(Unjust Enrichment)

33. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-32 of their complaint.

34. Defendant has been knowingly benefited at Plaintiffs' expense.

35. Allowance of Defendant to retain the benefit would be unjust under the circumstances.

36. Defendant's conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and/or recklessly committed, with wanton disregard of Plaintiffs' rights.

COUNT IV
(Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices)

37. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-36 of their complaint.

38. Defendant offers drug treatment services in the regular course of its business.

39. Defendant offered drug treatment services to the Plaintiffs, in the State of New Mexico, in the regular course of its business.

40. Defendant's actions are governed by the Unfair Trade Practices Act, §57-12-1 NMSA, et seq.

41. Defendant's actions violated the provisions of the Unfair Trade Practices Act including, but not limited to: §57-12-2(D)(7) NMSA, §57-12-2(D)(14) NMSA, §57-12-2(D)(17) NMSA, §57-12-2(E)(l) NMSA, and §57-12-2(E)(2)NMSA.

42. Defendant willfully engaged in these violations of the Unfair Trade Practices Act.

43. Defendant's conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and/or recklessly committed, with wanton disregard of Plaintiffs' rights.

44. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover actual or statutory damages, trebled.



WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Fred Luthy and Phyllis Luthy request that this court enter judgment in their favor and against the defendant Narconon Stone Hawk Rehabilitation Center Inc, and award Plaintiffs:

(a) Actual or statutory damages, trebled, for violations of the Unfair Trade Practices Act, §57-12-1 NMSA, et seq.,

(b) Actual damages and punitive damages in an amount to be proven at trial for the malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and/or recklessly committed breach of the contract.

(c) Damages sufficient to alleviate any unjust enrichment of Defendant.

(d) Reasonable attorney fees and costs, and

(e) Such other relief the Court deems just and proper.

Kelley-Streubel LLC

[signed]
Donald F. Kochersberger III
315 Fifth Street N.W.
Albuquerque, NM 87102
(505) 848-8581
(505) 848-8593
Attorneys for Plaintiffs



VERIFICATION

STATE OF NEW MEXICO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF BERNALILLO )

I, Fred Luthy, state that I have read the Verified Complaint for Fraud in the Inducement, Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices, Breach of Contract and Unjust Enrichment, and that the same is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

By [signed]
Fred Luthy

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 3rd day of January, 2007, by Fred Luthy.

[signed: Alicia M. Lapado]
Notary Public

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Scientology Corporate Fraud?




This morning Hawk Radio presented The Edge with Tom Smith featuring Larry Brennan, former high level scientology staff member who was intimately involved in the corporate set up of the tax exempt organization known as The Church of Scientology.

The timing of this show could not have been better. Atop news story from UPI yesterday is titled U.S. televangelists under finance scrutiny

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, may I suggest including the Church of Scientology in those audits? There may not be Rolls Royce puchases but there are many many gag agreements paid out to shut up those who have been victimized by scientology and it's front groups, like Narconon. Back in 1993, there may well have been some extortion in obtaining IRS tax exemption when the supreme court had already ruled that Scientology donations were not tax deductable.

After listening to Larry Brennan reveal some of the remaining pieces of the puzzle in how Scientology diverted funds to L. Ron Hubbard's inurement and still became a legalized non-profit religious "church", I'm sure you'll agree that it's worth investigating.

Readers can catch the taping of this show at either of these links:

http://www.lermanet.com/audio/bren.wma
13 Meg 55 Min

http://www.Lermanet.com/audio/bren.mp3
26 Meg 55 min

This is considered 'A devastating interview. Religious cloaking, corporate frauds, director perjury, disconnection, enforced abortions, slave camps and naziesque conduct.' I agree.

Larry Brennan did a very good job of explaining the hows and whys of his days in the Corporate bureau of the church. Many members were personally effected by what occurred during the Guardian's Office days and tumultuous early 80's. Insider Brennan goes into detail about the activities of leader David Miscavige and what he was doing to run the church he claimed to have no management connection to. We hear about Miscavige's terrible anger issues and what he is still doing to members who protest against the lies and illegalities he's propagated on behalf of the church. This hour long show is just the tip of the iceburg.

Listening to it brought to mind the courageous Gerry Armstrong, former member & archivist for L. Ron Hubbard. Here is his description of the beginning days of his adventures in questioning the lies he was being told to keep going. Scientology vs Armstrong.

There are many others who were there during this era in Scientology. More and more are defecting scientology. I'm looking forward to hearing more and appreciate Larry Brennan joining ranks with courageous people like Armstrong.

(Photo: Courtesy of Lermanet.com )

Friday, November 02, 2007

Is It Love? Tom Cruise On the Love Boat

Tom Cruise and David Miscavige pics*. Is It Love?




*Photos courtesy of Lermanet.com
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/tom.htm

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Complaints about Narconon

Do You, or Someone You Know, Have Unresolved Complaints With Any Narconon Program? You aren't alone. The list of common complaints is lengthy.

Despite what people are told, Narconon is Scientology. It's also a rip off, preying on loved ones and individuals desperate to be free of drug abuse. $24,000 - $29,0000 and upward is alot of money to lose. It's happening more and more and people are getting fed up.

Once a person forks that money over, in far too many cases it's as if the worst nightmare of their lifetime appears. If one does not agree with the program, especially the Scientology aspects of the program, they are harassed, isolated, and or kicked out. Phones seem to be bugged. Getting out is the first long step. Getting a refund then winds up being a battle of having to pester, threaten with legal means the organization to get someone to take responsibility for promises never delivered upon.

I've been getting emails lately from people who are upset with, or trying to get a refund from, one of the various Narconon programs across the United States. Each one of these people had a story similar to these cases:

Tara J's Experience
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Stop-Narconon/Personal/TaraJ/

The Beha Family experience : http://www.scientomogy.com/narconon_scam.php

Fred and Phyllis Luthy v Narconon Stonehawk Case:
Luthy Family Lawsuit Against Stone Hawk is for Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices. In January 2007, the Luthy family of Albuquerque, New Mexico filed a suit against Narconon Stone Hawk for fraud, unfair or deceptive trade practices, and unjust enrichment.

These and and others which can all be found here:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Stop-Narconon/StoneHawk/

In looking over multi state court and BBB records and cpmplaints, there is a real surge happening. Mistreatment, deceptive advertising, breach of contract, and enforced scientology beliefs are just a few of the same complains seen over and over again. I am gathering up the BBB & state case records information and will post it in chunks as I get it. I just want victims to know that they can do something about the injustice and mistreatment they received in exchange for their hard earned money and they are within their rights to obtain refunds.

The most important thing I can tell people is to immediately register at and add your complain to the other complains against Narconon at
http://www.ripoffreport.com/

Type in their search box NARCONON, and you'll be directed to the page of complaints.

The more reports that are filed there, the more leverage victims have with the states and federal government in getting full investigations done of this fraudulent organization.

For those who have not done so, get your story on the internet if it's not up there yet. It could be the key to helping you in your particular situation. 2 or 3 victims from the same state or county can do much together to get a complaint taken seriously enough to warrent a complete investigation.

If you like, you can also email me your story and I will get it posted on the internet for you, even if you want to remain anonymous. For those needing information on who to contact , where to go with your complaint, email me and let me know what county and state you live in so I can send you information.

Take a minute and visit these sites, where you can get more information about Narconon:

Narconon Exposed http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/

Narconon Victims Forum http://www.narcononvictims.com/

Stop Narconon www.stop-narconon.org/

NarCONon is Scientology! http://crackpots.xenu-directory.net/

NARCONON DIRECTOR QUITS. WARNS OUR COMMUNITY! http://www.lermanet.com/reference/new-flyers/narconon.pdf


Readers should ask the federal SAMHSA why they are referring people to this program and why they are allowing this program to exist in the first place. Contact their Center For Substance Abuse Treatment staff at 240-276-2750.

Mary McConnell
xscilentologist at yahoo dot com
http://free-from-scientology.blogspot.com/

Sunday, September 23, 2007

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES Goes Inside Scientology

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES
Inside Scientology
Aired May 14, 2007 - 22:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

...................................... [..]
Up next on 360: our in-depth look at Scientology.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER (voice-over): He started out investigating Scientologists. He says the Scientologists ended up investigating him.

TOMMY DAVIS, SPOKESMAN, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY: I would just like to -- and -- and I hope somebody is shooting this. OK. Good.

JOHN SWEENEY, BBC REPORTER: Rather, there's actually -- to be fair, there's...

TOMMY DAVIS: There's...

(CROSSTALK) SWEENEY: ... there's one camera from the BBC and one camera from your...

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: What this reporter says he found out about how Scientology operates and how it really got under his skin.

SWEENEY: You were not there at the beginning of that interview! You were not there!

COOPER: Ahead on 360.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVIS: For you to repeatedly refer to my faith in those terms is so derogatory, so offensive and so bigoted. And the reason you keep repeating it is because you wanted to get a reaction like you're getting right now. Well, buddy, you got it, right here, right now. I'm angry, real angry.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: That was Scientology spokesman Tommy Davis during an interview with John Sweeney.

Davis may have been angry, but the real fireworks, a full-fledged meltdown, actually came later in the interview. And it was the reporter, not the Scientologist, who blew a fuse. Now he's become a big part of the story, something reporters are never supposed to do.

Here's how it all began with CNN's Randi Kaye.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JOHN SWEENEY, BBC REPORTER: Don't (INAUDIBLE)

TOMMY DAVIS, SPOKESMAN, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY: No, I'm not stopping here.

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: You listen to me for a second.

RANDI KAYE, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): What you're about to see is a reporter crack. John Sweeney had been investigating the Church of Scientology for the BBC. He says he was chased by sinister strangers and spied on at his own wedding.

Just before he lost it, Sweeney attended an Industry of Death exhibition. Members of the church showed disturbing video and blamed the Holocaust on psychiatry. SWEENEY: No, Tommy, you...

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime!

SWEENEY: No. Listen to me! You were not there at the beginning of that interview!

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime! It's a crime!

KAYE: Sweeney's documentary "Scientology and Me" included the clips of his shouting match with Scientologist Tom Davis.

SWEENEY: Do you understand?

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime against humanity.

SWEENEY: Do you understand?

KAYE: Clips of Sweeney's meltdown were posted on YouTube. Sweeney did not want to be interviewed tonight, but released a statement on the BBC's Web site: "Scientology has prepared an attack video. Scientologists are expected to release 100,000 copies of it. Why?"

BRUCE HINES, FORMER SCIENTOLOGIST: To try to get him to back off and possibly to get the BBC to back off. And, secondly, it's just to discredit the individual John Sweeney. He's the one doing this documentary on Scientology. And, if they can show that he is not credible, they will do that.

KAYE: Former Scientologist Bruce Hines, who left the church after 30 years, says it's common practice for Scientologists to keep their on cameras rolling on reporters.

MIKE RINDER, DIRECTOR, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL: John Sweeney would have denied that anything that he had done happened. That would have all ended up on the cutting room floor. Nobody would have ever seen it.

DAVIS: I would just like to -- and -- and I hope somebody is shooting this. OK. Good.

SWEENEY: Rather, there's actually -- to be fair, there's...

DAVIS: There's...

(CROSSTALK)

SWEENEY: ... there's one camera from the BBC and one camera from your...

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: No, you listen to me for a second. You have...

SWEENEY: Some people say it's a cult. DAVIS: ... no right whatsoever to say what and what isn't a religion. The Constitution of the United States of America guarantees one's right to practice and believe freely in this country. And the definition of religion is very clear. And it's not defined by John Sweeney.

KAYE: Here, Sweeney had just suggested to Davis, critics believe Scientology is a cult.

SWEENEY: Now, my friend, it is your turn to listen to...

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: Goodbye.

SWEENEY: No. It is your turn to listen to me.

I'm a British subject, not an American citizen. And, in my country, we have a freedom of speech.

KAYE (on camera): In his documentary, Sweeney apologizes for losing control. He says he was wrong, that he let him team down, lost his voice, but not his mind.

In a separate video being shown on YouTube, he apologized to Tom Davis and the Church of Scientology.

SWEENEY: You were interrupting me or preventing me from saying my points.

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: You interrupted me first. But that's immaterial.

SWEENEY: And I wanted to demonstrate to you that, actually, my voice is louder than yours. But I did it in a way which I -- I regret. And I apologize to the Church of Scientology.

(CROSSTALK)

KAYE (voice-over): None of this surprises former Scientologist Bruce Hines, who says specific steps are taken to respond to reporters.

HINES: These give quite a lot of information about what to do about what they call black propaganda. And black propaganda, in their view, is any sort of negative -- negative publicity.

KAYE: Negative publicity is nothing new for the Church of Scientology. But, this time, it may have successfully turned the tables, exposing a journalist, a critic, at his worst, faster than he could apologize.

Randi Kaye, CNN, New York.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Well, the BBC reporter, John Sweeney, says the church is doing what it always does, playing hardball with journalists who try to investigate the organization.

Mike Rinder is director of the Church of Scientology International. He sees it differently.

In a CNN exclusive interview, I talked with him earlier.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Mike, I want to play a clip from this documentary, the reporter John Sweeney clearly losing his cool while talking with a Scientologist official. Let's take a look at that.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVIS: No, I'm not stopping here.

SWEENEY: No. No.

DAVIS: You listen to me for a second. You're accusing my members of my religion of engaging in brainwashing.

SWEENEY: No, Tommy, you...

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime!

SWEENEY: No. Listen to me!

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime! It's a crime!

SWEENEY: You were not there at the beginning of that interview!

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime.

SWEENEY: You were not there!

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime.

SWEENEY: You did not hear or record all of the interview! Do you understand?

(CROSSTALK)

DAVIS: Brainwashing is a crime against humanity.

SWEENEY: Do you understand? You are quoting the second half of the interview, not the first half!

DAVIS: You are accusing my organization of engaging in a crime.

(CROSSTALK)

SWEENEY: You cannot assert what you're saying. Now, you listen to me.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: He's apologized. He said, clearly, that was not his finest moment. The clip was released on YouTube. Some say that the church was behind the release of it to try to discredit this reporter in advance of his critical report on Scientology.

To your knowledge, did the church release it?

RINDER: No, Anderson. I mean, I'm not sure how that got on to YouTube. There were copies of that clip that were around.

I had sent various copies to the BBC, in fact, when I came over here to see them about the -- the behavior of John Sweeney in putting together this program. So, I'm not really sure how it ended up...

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: You distributed 100,000 DVDs containing that clip, though. Why did you do that?

RINDER: We did it because we documented what happened in the whole series of events that had led up to John Sweeney doing this program.

When he first contacted us, Anderson, he asked us and said he would like to do an update program on Scientology, a 20-year update. In fact, Panorama had done a program 20 years ago that was based on a lawsuit at that time that was thrown out, with a judge who said that it was the most egregious violation of court orders he had ever seen. And that program got things totally wrong.

Panorama came back and said, we would like to do another program.

We said, sure.

We -- look, we understand that there's a lot of people that don't understand what Scientology is, and have misunderstandings. And we recognize we have a responsibility to make the information available. So, we told him, look, we will open our doors to you. You can have very, very broad access.

You can see anything you want. We will take you around to all our buildings. We will give you broad access. He refused that access. In fact, he went to Clearwater, where our spiritual headquarter is. And we have a huge facility there. And he didn't set foot inside the church, even though we were there to offer to take him in and open the doors for him and introduce him to people, et cetera.

At that point, we realized that we had a reporter on our hands who was not interested in really telling the story about what Scientology is, but he had a preconceived idea. He wanted to do a story that Scientology has closed doors. That wasn't the case at all.

We were there, waiting to let him in, waiting to make everything available to him. And he absolutely refused.

(CROSSTALK)

RINDER: So, at that point, we decided we will document what happens.

And we have now produced a DVD, which we are distributing, which shows what goes on behind the scenes in a program that's put together by someone like John Sweeney.

COOPER: What did end up in this program, though, is that this reporter clearly shows multiple people following him in cars and on foot.

He says those are members of the Church of Scientology or people affiliated with the church. It does seem kind of ominous and creepy.

Do you have people who follow reporters? I mean, were those people in -- in the documentary in the cars -- and there was a gentleman who repeatedly showed up every day while he was eating breakfast and at his hotel. Were they people following him?

RINDER: No, they weren't, Anderson. I mean, he's got a shot in that program that aired tonight...

COOPER: So, you don't have people following anybody?

RINDER: No, we don't.

COOPER: If a reporter is doing a story on you -- you -- you didn't send anybody out to follow this man?

RINDER: No. No, we did not, Anderson.

In fact, it was very -- we were very up front with him. We said, we're going to have our cameras here. We're going to take footage of you putting together this program.

COOPER: Who were...

RINDER: That was it.

COOPER: Who do you think those people were, though, who were following him? I mean, clearly, it seemed like -- I mean, if he's telling the truth, people were following him.

RINDER: I don't think he was telling the truth, Anderson.

I think that that was someone who was in a car in Los Angeles. I'm surprised that he and a cameraman could get out and pull up to a car in a stop sign or a stoplight in Los Angeles, and try and shoot inside a car.

He's lucky -- if he was -- it was in some areas of Los Angeles, he's lucky that he got away with his life.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Well, coming up: another view from a former Scientologist who left the church after more than 20 years. Also, we will go in search of a sacred vault from the air -- when 360 continues.

And we will have more of our interview with Mr. Rinder.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It wasn't me. You were not there at the beginning of the interview! You were not there.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Brain (ph), what's a crime?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: We pick up now where we left off before the break, the latest controversy to hit the Church of Scientology. A BBC reporter -- you just saw him there -- losing his cool during an interview while the church's cameras were rolling.

The tape showing his melt-down ended up on YouTube. And now the reporter's accusing Scientology of playing hardball to try to discredit him to his investigation of the church will come under suspicion. The BBC reporter says he was followed as part of a church campaign against him.

That's where we pick up my interview with Mike Rinder, director of the Church of Scientology International.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: It is well known, though, that certainly, in the journalism community, that if you do a story on the Church of Scientology, you are going to be hearing from attorneys, that you -- the church has a reputation of being very aggressive in going after or in protecting their public relations. Is that fair? Is that true?

RINDER: I don't think that's a fair statement, Anderson. I think that what happens is that there are stories that get circulated or that there are people who are the bad eggs in the -- bad egg reporters like John Sweeney, and that, then, becomes blown up.

Certainly, when someone shows up and he refuses access, and he is abusive and offensive to the people that he interviews, we're not just going to stand around and take it.

We, that's why we took the footage of him, so that we would have it documented, because I know what would have happened, Anderson. If we had not taken that footage, John Sweeney would have denied that anything that he had done happened. That would have all ended up on the cutting room floor. Nobody would have ever seen it. COOPER: "The L.A. Times" cites the church's founder, L. Ron Hubbard's, "Manual of Justice", as saying, and I quote, "The purpose of the lawsuit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or anything or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Don't ever defend. Always attack."

A, is that an accurate quote? And if so, it does seem to imply a certain aggression and -- or willingness to litigate.

RINDER: Well, first of all, that is an accurate quote. It is taken out of context. It is not saying anything about you must litigate. It's talking about the subject of litigation as a subject.

But we're not suing the media. We're not -- we're not sitting here saying that we're going to be suing or doing anything of the sort. We documented what happened, so people can see for themselves and make up their own mind. That's the purpose of doing that video.

COOPER: According to a 1991 "TIME" magazine article, quote -- and I'm quoting from the article, "Eleven top scientologists including Hubbard's wife, were sent to prison in the early 1980s for infiltrating, burglarizing, wiretapping more than 100 private and government agencies in attempts to block their investigations."

A, is that true? And, B -- well, is that true? Because I mean, the critics of your organization say that you guys have a history of this, that whether this John Sweeney was a bad reporter or not, this is part of a pattern, that "TIME" magazine article certainly intimating that.

RINDER: Anderson, the history of the church is a long history of the church. And certainly, there are things that have happened. Those people that were involved in those activities back then, they were thrown out by the church. They were dismissed from the church. That's ancient history.

COOPER: That "TIME" magazine article, in 1991, which was a cover story, the writer of that article says, even in the course of his writing and his assignment, that he was -- he said illegally investigated by affiliates of the Church of Scientology. He was contacted numerous times by attorneys.

And, in fact, "TIME" magazine, Time Warner, the parent company, which also owns CNN, was sued. And the case was finally thrown out at multiple levels. I think it went up until 1997 or 1998.

So I just want to again ask you, isn't the church very aggressive in litigating, still, to this day?

RINDER: No, that's absolutely not the case, Anderson. You're talking about something in 1991. We're in 2007.

COOPER: But the lawsuit went up, I think, until 1998.

RINDER: That was the appeals. COOPER: All of which were thrown out.

RINDER: That's the appeals, Anderson. Yes. Ultimately -- ultimately, that's correct. But you're talking about something in 1991. We're in 2007. We are seeking to move forward.

COOPER: Mike, we appreciate your perspective and appreciate you coming on the program again. Thank you very much.

RINDER: OK, Anderson, thank you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Coming up a former scientologist insider speaks out. We'll hear from him shortly.

Plus, a look at a scientology center that some says aerial markings for future alien contact. A mystery about what it really means. We'll try to find out.

Also tonight, a toddler, a gun and a gun license? How did that happen? What were they thinking, when 360 continues.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Tomorrow on 360, we're going to take you inside Africa. It's a continent often ignored and misunderstood, a place of hardship and hope. I sat down with CNN's Jeff Koinange, who covers Africa for us. It's an in-depth look at a continent we cover too infrequently.

This is information we think the world needs to know. Here's part of our talk.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Even in South Africa, a very well-developed country, many government officials there claim HIV does not result in AIDS, that these deaths are not being caused by HIV infection.

JEFF KOINANGE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: And what it does, especially in the less educated areas of South Africa, what it does is people think, "Wow, the officials say we can't get AIDS. Or AIDS -- HIV doesn't cause AIDS." So they go about doing what it is they do, and the numbers blow up.

So, it starts at the top. If the top cannot address this issue or acknowledge, then it all filters down. And that's why you have that situation in South Africa, one of the highest rates of HIV/AIDS on the continent.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: We'll have more from CNN's Jeff Koinange tomorrow night. Don't miss "Africa: Dispatches from the Edge", a 360 special.

We're looking at scientology tonight. It isn't the first time the controversial church has been in the news on or on our broadcast.

In the fall of 2005, two gigantic circles etched into the desert in New Mexico made headlines. The markings looked like crop circles and led straight to the Church of Scientology.

CNN's Gary Tuchman investigated, but the church in this story didn't cooperate.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

GARY TUCHMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The land is rugged on the south end of the Rocky Mountain range. A panoramic view of northeastern New Mexico under clear skies, which makes it easier to see an unusual sight.

(on camera) This is it.

(voice-over) Two huge interlocking circles, markings on the desert soil that cannot be seen from the ground but can be seen from the heavens.

MICHAEL PATTINSON, FORMER SCIENTOLOGY MEMBER: I think they're not designed to be seen by human beings but by alien beings.

TUCHMAN: Michael Pattinson says he was a member of the Church of Scientology for 23 years. Now he's a disgruntled ex-member who says the circles are sign posts for reincarnated scientologists who come from outer space.

PATTINSON: They are markings to show the location of one of the vaults which scientology has prepared to safeguard the technology of L. Ron Hubbard.

TUCHMAN: Hubbard, who died in 1986, was a science fiction writer who started the Church of Scientology.

And indeed, next to the circles on the private runway is a building with a vault built into the mountain. Current scientologists do say archives are held in the vaults, just as other religions safeguard their sacred texts. They say the vault is overseen by a scientology corporation called the Church of Spiritual Technology.

(on camera) Church of Scientology officials denied CNN's request for a tour of the compound. They say the markings are simply a logo for the Church of Spiritual Technology and that this is a non-story.

But from what we've experienced, church officials are extremely sensitive about this non-story.

(voice-over) A pilot we hired to fly us over the compound backed out, saying he got a call from scientologists asking him not to go with us. Other pilots would not fly us, because they didn't want to make the scientologists angry. But we did finally get a pilot.

(on camera) What do the circles look like to you from here?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: They look like a branding symbol a rancher might have put out there.

TUCHMAN (voice-over): The closest town to the desert etchings is Las Vegas, New Mexico. The county sheriff there is one of few non- scientologists who have visited the compound. Chris Najar did so just last month for the first time.

SHERIFF CHRIS NAJAR, SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, NEW MEXICO: Every time an incident happened, for instance, Waco, or the World Trade Center incident, every time something like this happens, there seems to be rumblings that it's a training ground for militia or a terrorist training ground, that kind of thing. So they have been inviting me out there so we can go out and try to dispel those rumors.

TUCHMAN (on camera): Have you dispelled those rumors?

NAJAR: Well, we went out there. I didn't see anything of the sort.

TUCHMAN (voice-over): The sheriff says the scientologists told him this is where L. Ron Hubbard writings, saved on titanium plates, will be preserved for thousands of years. He says many people were there, lots of farm animals and a large cache of food supplies.

(on camera) Did it strike you as a place for survivalists?

NAJAR: Quite possibly. I definitely want to go there if it hits the fan.

TUCHMAN: If it hits the fan.

(voice-over) the sheriff says the notion of spacecraft returning was not discussed with him, but former members say that's part of scientology teachings.

PATTINSON: I know it sounds very, very bizarre, but this is where reality is stranger than fiction.

TUCHMAN: So are the circles a landing pad for extraterrestrial vehicles? The church is not commenting to us.

Gary Tuchman, CNN, Las Vegas, New Mexico.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Well, up next, you heard from a scientologist spokesman. We'll hear from another former scientologist, who was a member for 30 years. What does he think of the new video of the BBC reporter yelling at a Church of Scientology representative? And about the church's methods in dealing with critics.

Plus, tonight, a bizarre story. A gun-toting 10-month-old, not exactly. He's been issued a permit. What were they thinking, when 360 continues.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, I'm not stopping here. You listen to me for a second. You're accusing members of my religion of engaging in brainwashing.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, shut up. No, listen to me!

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: John Sweeney, reporter with the BBC, on the right, losing his cool with a scientology official.

The church is back in the news because of, well, really, this video showing a BBC reporter fighting with a scientologist, or arguing. The reporter, who was making a documentary about scientology, says the church is playing hardball.

Church officials say they are not.

Bruce Hines was a scientologist for more than 30 years. He reached the church's upper level before leaving. He joins me now.

Bruce, first of all, we just had on Mike Rinder, a spokesman for Scientology International, who said that the church is trying to become more open, trying to give more access to reporters, that maybe there was secrecy in the past, but increasingly, they're being open and honest. Do you think that's true?

BRUCE HINES, FORMER SCIENTOLOGIST: That may be. They still are going to try to control any negative publicity that they -- that some reporter might do. But it could be that they're trying to show certain aspects of the church.

COOPER: There are some who accuse the church of trying to intimidate and discredit people, in particular, reporters, famously this "TIME" magazine reporter back in 1991 said that, after he wrote an article, a cover story, there was various investigations done on him.

Sweeney say his was followed. The Church of Scientology says, pointblank, they didn't follow John Sweeney. Do you believe they follow people?

HINES: I definitely think they do. And with due respect to Mr. Rinder, I don't think he was being truthful about that. I know they do hire private investigators, and I know that they do follow people.

COOPER: You say you know that. How?

HINES: When I worked in the church, I had dealings with certain people within the Office of Special Affairs, and Mike Rinder was the head of that. I assume he still is. And they have a legal branch. They have a public relations branch, and they have an intelligence branch. And that's part of the activities that they would do.

COOPER: I mean, not many churches have intelligence branches. I can understand a legal branch, certainly. Why -- what did the intelligence branch do and why would they follow somebody?

HINES: It's all part of the long standing policy that anyone who is critical or attacks the Church of Scientology, they should be attacked back. And that is very clearly, you can read policies from the 1970s, from the 1960s. Anyone who is critical, they have to be discredited or stopped in some way.

COOPER: Why is there secrecy? I mean, I understand you know they have this mythology, I guess, the creation myth, which all religions have. And I guess it involves space aliens or Zenu, and I don't want to -- I don't really know, so I don't want to denigrate it by sort of inaccurately describing it.

But I can understand them wanting to keep that secret because some religions do that. But why is there this secrecy surrounding so much of scientology?

HINES: Well, on the one hand you say there are these upper level scriptures they want to keep secret.

But on the other hand, they do have a covert operations department, and this, the purpose of that is to get information and to plan activities against people who they perceive as enemies.

They feel that their religion, their practice, is the only thing that's going to save the world. And this is laid out in policy by L. Ron Hubbard, and the people like Mike Rinder and Tommy Davis, they feel they're doing the right thing by following these policies.

So anyone they see who could be -- they perceive that could stop their mission, they have to be gotten out of the way, intimidated, anything. There's one policy from about, I think it was the late '50s, I'm not sure, but it's -- referring to a critic or an attacker, Mr. Hubbard said, "If possible, ruin him utterly." And the "ruin him utterly" are Mr. Hubbard's words.

COOPER: You think that is still very much a practice or a belief in the organization?

HINES: Yes, I do, because...

COOPER: You...

HINES: Go ahead.

COOPER: Sorry. You were one of the top managers in the C organization, which I guess would be the upper reaches of scientology. Allegedly, you trained some celebrities like Kirstie Alley, Nicole Kidman.

What is the appeal of Scientology? What was the appeal to you when you were in it? I mean, what good did it do in your life? Because clearly, you stayed in it an awfully long time. It must have had positive benefits for you. And then why did you decide to leave?

HINES: Well, it's interesting. I've asked myself that question many times. When you first encounter scientology, you're presented with certain things. And there are some simple courses. And they make sense. For the most part.

And then, I found myself sort of getting more and more involved and, for some inexplicable reason, and I now consider it some form of mind control, I just took on their mind-set.

And I -- five years ago, I would have -- if I'd seen John Sweeney, I would have thought, you know, this man just is doing some horrible thing, and he has to be gotten out of the way. Now, I think he has every right to report on, you know, as he sees it. He's a journalist.

I left because originally I disagreed with some of the changes that had taken place. These were of a technical nature.

After I left -- because the whole time I was in, I was totally sheltered from the Internet, from television. I didn't get any of the stories, the sort of the negative stories about scientology. And so I've learned more and more as time has bond gone on. And it's been a process for me of kind of unraveling this sort of stuck thinking that I had.

COOPER: Bruce, it's an interesting thing. And I'd like to talk to you more about it at another time. Appreciate you being on the program. Bruce Hines, thank you very much.

HINES: My pleasure. Thank you.

[..] (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.voxant.com

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0705/14/acd.01.html
__________________________________________________
Many thanks to Cooper Anderson, Bruce Hines, Michael Pattinson & John Sweeney.

I hope the rumors are true, that Mike Rinder left Scientology. It's never too late for a man to redeem himself in the eyes of God. Scientology does not forgive but God does.
~ Mary McConnell
Out_Of_The_Dark & FormerlyFooled


Monday, August 27, 2007

Message to Kate Coe: How You Got the Theresa Duncan Story - Wrong, Again

Ok, I've been away from the Blog regarding Theresa Duncan and Jeremy Blake but I've not forgotten to update readers as promised. I'm still short on distraction-free time to post more extensively about the infomation I have come across, so this blog piece will have to suffice for the time being.

Just today I had a few minutes and just happened to be browsing some of the blogs when I saw that the infamous Kate Coe, of Mediabistro's Fishbowl LA and the unjournalistic LA Weekly pieces on Duncan and Blake, had actually replied to something I'd written a while back in reply to Anne Thompson's August 7, 2007 blurb: Suicide Watch: Blake and Duncan Undone by Paranoia blurb over at Thompson on Hollywood .

I seized the opportunity to give Coe a piece of my mind, thereby including some of the information I'd initially reserved for the update blog piece. I just could not help myself. I am a firm believer that, when opportunity knocks, one should answer the door. So I did.

Kate Coe replies to the comment left by me, Mary McConnell August 15, 2007 at 05:30 PM

"Mary-- I talked to Father Morales for several hours on more than one occasion. While Theresa and Jeremy were indeed very distressed, Father Morales saw no evidence of anyone following, stalking or harassing them. I quoted two people who went on the record about the accusatory emails and letters that Duncan and Blake had sent them--both got lawyers, neither had any affiliation with COS.I was stalked by members of a cult--Children of God--two years ago, and I'm extremely familiar with what it's like to find random photos of my license plates, my kid's school and my dog posted on a website, as well as threatening letters sent to my workplace.

Further investigation may indeed prove that some of your assertions are correct. But to accuse everyone who has a view of Theresa Duncan that differs from yours does not make them a tool of LRON. "
Posted by: Kate Coe August 17, 2007 at 09:06 PM

And I take her to task in reply to it ( I've corrected a typo or two here and edited missing information from the original in bold) :

"Kate, if you spent 2 hours speaking to Father Frank Morales, then where is the evidence of it in any of your articles? Nowhere. Nada. Perhaps the reverend did not give you enough meat to help you shore up your story.

There are many people you did not speak to or perhaps did speak to but you've dismissed as credible because you went into this story to malign the reputations of these two people. Good close friends are not necessary for trash articles like yours and Mr. Lee's. Carol "Christine" Nichols is no better than you for alluding to a professional friendship where none existed anymore. Her's ended years before because she was a lousy businesswoman and was pro-scientology. Interesting how she just happened to be the first mole to speak up badly about the two. You must have been frothing at the bit for the July 31st announcement of Jeremy being ID'd so you could get your trash piece up on August 1st. It's almost as if the thought that these 2 people had good loyal friends, and relatives, had never occurred to you.

Search the internet and you will find those who are calling you out on your coverage of these 2.

Here's one for starters: Raymond Doherty's August 09, 2007
A Letter to Kate Coe: How You Got the Theresa Duncan Story - Wrong

Instead of doing the decent thing and getting a balanced story, you with your envious grudge went seeking those they dismissed as unloyal, all the while implying that these bitter losers would make a better story to match you preconceived gossipy article intended to destroy the goodwill they'd created on the internet.

What a glorious moment I am having, being able to finally respond to you, the rabbit who posts trash on others blogs minimizing the largess of these 2 special and well loved people, then running for cover after you've heated things up with your rumormongering.

**Blake's stepfather knows full well about the intended lawsuit Blake and Duncan were set to begin against Scientology. He probably offered to help them, until he found out just who it was that was to be sued. It's bad enough that Blake's mother is a mental health counselor - a fav target of scientology and it's CCHR front group- but the truth is that Arthur C. Delibert works for the very law firm who provided pro bono representation and lost a major case for their client who was being sued relentlessly by The 'church' of scientology and related entities. And Mr & Mrs Delibert probably tried to talk them out of filing their case against such a hyper-litigious and evil organization. This would surely explain Theresa's last* blog quote.

But you never did your research on the possibility that there was truth to the couple being harassed. Perhaps your own fears from your own experience you mentioned made it easy for you to take the easy way out. Good journalism does not do what you did and failed to do. Shame on you for justifying your lousy articles and selfcentered & myopic blog comments.
If you go down in history for the biased and unprofessional work you did on the life and deaths of this couple, it will be of no more surprise to many. Shame on you.

Posted by: Mary McConnell August 27, 2007 at 09:04 AM

----------------------------------------------------------

Duncan wrote: "Wayne Coyne of The Flaming Lips will be on Jay Leno tonight, children of the Staircase. Wayne was harassed by Scientologists after working with Beck Hansen just like Wit and Mr. Wit Of The Staircase were."

The Seattle, WA office of Arthur Delibert's firm, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis,

**Paul Lawrence. CAN's attorney in the Scott case on appeal in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, of the Seattle firm of Preston, Gates and Ellis. Lawrence is also the President of the Washington State American Civil Liberties Union. Preston, Gates and Ellis is representing CAN pro bono. Did Scientology Strike Back? American Lawyer/June 1997by Susan Hansen

Yes. The church of Scientology now owns, uses, and operates as and under the tradmark name " Cult Awareness Network" .

So, when you call the hotline to get information about cults, you are talking to a scientologist but you are not made aware of that fact. Quite deceptive. Very Hubbardian.

If Jeremy Blake's parents tried to convince him NOT to sue the Church of Scientology, I can see why Theresa Duncan might have lost hope and sang this swang song of defeat:

* Wit of The Staircase July 10, 2007 Storytelling On The Staircase :

"A need to tell and hear stories is essential to the species Homo sapiens--second in necessity apparently after nourishment and before love and shelter. Millions survive without love or home, almost none in silence; the opposite of silence leads quickly to narrative, and the sound of story is the dominant sound of our lives, from the small accounts of our day's events to the vast incommunicable constructs of psychopaths." --Reynolds Price

Thursday, August 23, 2007

WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH SCIENTOLOGY? Parts I & II

'What's the Matter with Scientology?', Ross Douthat of Atlantic dot com. asks. He then provides accurate answers in 2 separate articles in reply to Mark Oppenheimer's puff piece on Scientology and his response Douthat's 1 sentence wham of Part I. The more extensive Part II is a comment on Oppenheimer's response to Part I. Both are excellent and worth reading.

As I commented to Douthat's Part II :

"If Mr Oppenheimer were a Scientologist, he'd wear the label 'Theetie Weetie' , a meaning Hubbard gave to those who sugar coat the hard truth because they cannot handle it.

Mark Oppenheimer tried unsuccessfully to conclude his opinion of Scientology based upon the unique situation Milton Katselas has managed to keep himself in. Being able to control his own involvement in the cult to his own advantage.

Katselas is the exception to the rule other scientologists must follow because he's a 'celebrity' who they are afraid of. You see, the church forgot Katselas about back in the 80's when David Miscavige took reign. All he has to do is make a few phone calls announcing he's called it quits, and the cardboard church falls apart in Hollywood.

Katselas is a fringe member who has not really moved up the cult 'bridge to total freedom' in years, sitting comfortably right where he is, using the parts of scientology that he feels are helpful, gaining a steady flow of clientele as a 'celebrity' while keeping the church staff & management pitbulls at bey.

One day I hope Katselas sees the damage he's doing to the minds of others by creating this facade around the truth, flimsey as it may seem to us 'wogs'.

Mary
ps: Because of your public disapproval of scientology, your scientologist relative may well be forced to 'handle or disconnect' from you. I hope he comes to his senses before they make mincemeat out of him for the connection. "

Posted by Mary McConnell August 23, 2007 7:43 AM

Friday, August 10, 2007

Were Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan "Paranoid" or Did Scientology Stalk and Harass the Couple as They Claimed?

I just finished reading the blog Gothamist 'Duncan and Blake's Final Days' article of August 9, 2007 by Jen Carlson.

Despite ending the article with Glenn O'Brien's eloquent final words on Duncan's blog, The Wit of the Staircase, Carlson's article seems to me to be just more of the same propaganda being used recently to slander the late Theresa Duncan and Jeremy Blake as being "paranoid".

"Most agree, however, that the accusations, lawsuit and blame being placed on others - all came from a place of paranoia." says Carlson, followed by more quoted slander from The Observer. But is that true? Not really.

In the first and only report from the Washington Post about the Blake and Duncan matters, ' The Puzzling, Tragic End of A Golden Couple ' we read the first and only media comment made by the family:

"Obviously there was much more going on than any of us realized, but he never said anything that suggested there was a problem," said Anne Schwartz Delibert, Jeremy Blake's mother and Theresa Duncan's mother-in-law. "He was devoted to her. He was a loyal caretaker."

Anne Schwartz Delibert is a licensed professional mental health counselor specializing in marriage and family counseling, her office information available on the internet as practicing in the Silver Spring, MD & DC area.

How could Blake's own mother not see the symptoms of paranoia suggested by so many anonymous twits, supposid colleagues friends and in articles like this one. All this beginning the day Jeremy Blake was officially identified as deceased? At the top of the list we find the vengful Kate Coe, scrambling to wherever she can post a derogatory comment whilst no one can post a comment on her blog piece nor the Media Bistro plug and the LA Times piece she co-oped with the very misinformed writer, Chris Lee

As another commentor on the Washington Post article stated "Could it be that these "friends" claiming the couple were mentally unbalanced were not really friends at all and that this is just a seized opportunity for the expression of resentment in a profession known for the potential for displaced envy?"

It's worse than that. I think it's is an outright smear campaign. I am not alone in thinking this. The onslaught of rabid comments is so intense that I suspect many real friends are still shaking their heads trying to digest it and formulate some semblence of truth out of it all.

Interestingly, The Church of Scientology is renowned for treating their enemies to just that kind of smear campaign. But of course, "they were paranoid"... right?

Read the case of Robert W. Welkos, who was harassed shortly before the Los Angeles Times published a comprehensive series on the Church of Scientology he'd co-written with Times staff writer, Joel Sappell. http://www.rickross.com/reference/scientology/scien384.html

Or try comprehending the horrors writer Paul Brachi had to endure after his expose of Scientology was published in the UK DailyMail:
'Tom Cruise's Church of hate tried to destroy me'by PAUL BRACCHI -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=455886&in_page_id=1879

Paulette Cooper's story is true and verified, yet she was smeared as a terrorist and labeled as mentally unstable until she convinced a judge and jury by willingly being questioned while under 'truth serum'. Several years later an FBI raid of the church found documents that proved the church had set her up.
http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/cooper1.html

Paulette Cooper spoke up recently in an article for the New York Press Club telling even more details than was contained in her a book written over 30 years ago. Slate Magazine did a review of it:
Writer: I Was Stalked by Scientologists
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/06/writer-i-was-stalked-by-scientologists.php#more

You can & should read the complete article from The New York Press Club's Byline:
Looking over my shoulder,The Inside Account of the Story That Almost Killed Me
The Scandal of the Scandal of Scientology
Saturday, June 23, 2007 By Paulette Cooper
http://www.lermanet.com/paulette-cooper/index.htm

When Time Magazine writer RICHARD BEHAR wrote ' Scientology, Thriving Cult of Greed and Power 1991 - (c) Time Magazine, he and others were sued and harassed. Hear his experience as a victim of Scientology's 'Fair Game' Tactics as he discusses it for the first time upon receiving the 1992 LEO J. RYAN award for Cult Awareness http://www.lermanet.com/scientologyscandals/behar.htm

There are many more ordinary and extraordinary people who were made to suffer personal and familial harassment that looking over their shoulder became a way of life for a time. Each one would not hesitate to suggest that it's quite possible Blake and Duncan were being stalked and harassed by the Church of Scientology. Besides, how can a mother NOT know her child is 'paranoid'? Especially one educated in mental illness?

The wolves are out in droves, devouring the reputations of two talented people who deserve better. They claimed the Scientologists were harassing them. They were not alone in claiming to be a target of what is known as Scientology's practice of Fair Game tactics. Let's hope truth reigns after the pack settles down.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

"USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program" said the ad

"Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program"???

What is this Scientology MUZZLED DESTIM PROGRAM ?

Well, it may possibly be a part of the infamous Introspection Rundown.

You see, Scientology not only tries hard to silence it's critics, it has a history of driving to suicide or killing it's members who become mentally unstable. So what is a cult to do? Create the Muzzled Destimulation Program" as a preliminary step to the of the original Interspection Rundown? It makes sense since they were sued for the use of the original in the sad and preventable death of McPherson.

Scientology kills particularly when the tactics used violate basic human rights to life and prevent proper medical help.

In this way, it killed Lisa McPherson, Dale Bogen and so many others.

I don't make this stuff up. The evidence is out there. Been going on for years. Google "scientology kills" or the above names names and see for yourself.

As a result of the criminal investigation of the church related to Lisa McPherson's death, the Church of Scientology created a binding contract with members and it is one of the stipulations within the contract that one can be held against their own will pay for and receive the cult's service called the Introspection Rundown:
Scientology's barbaric treatment of members in lieu of some proper medical attention - the kind scientology rejects.

Here's a quote from a stellar article about this 'contract'as published in Razor Magazine "Church's Lethal Contract written By Dr. David S. Touretzky and Peter Alexander:

"Imagine a church so dangerous, you must sign a release form before you can receive its "spiritual assistance." This assistance might involve holding you against your will for an indefinite period, isolating you from friends and family, and denying you access to appropriate medical care. You will of course be billed for this treatment - assuming you survive it. If not, the release form absolves your caretakers of all responsibility for your suffering and death. Welcome to the Church of Scientology."
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Scientology/ReleaseForms/archive/razor-article-2003.html

Well, the contract in question is apparently in active use by the cult. Take a look at the most condemning piece of evidence for it, an advertisement for a job opening over at the Razzline, a Scientologist run cyberspace place for scientologists (SCN's) only to post news, ads and such. The ad is asking for help to muzzle a troubled 21 year old. Because it concerns an unnamed young man in distress, I ask that you say a prayer that the proposed action against him is prevented. Here's the ad:

USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program

Published July 26th, 2007 in CLASSIFIED and JOB OPPORTUNITY.
From: Dan Dempster
USA - Urgently need someone experienced in muzzled destim program

I’m urgently looking for someone who is experienced to do a muzzled destimulation program with a 21-year-old male. May take a number of weeks. Large male preferred. $800 per week plus all expenses.
Beautiful location on a 25-acre waterfront property on a large lake.

Call me right away.
Dan xxx.xxx.xxxx

http://www.therazzline.net/2007/07/26/usa-urgently-need-someone-experienced-in-muzzled-destim-program/

One becomes a member of this RAZZLINE by following the rules in the Membership section. Here are some but not all of the rules:
"How to Sponsor a friend: To sponsor someone you need to inform me of the following things: - That you know the person you’re sponsoring personally - as in you’ve met them face-to-face.- You know them to be a SCN in good standing."

So it is clear that a scientologist named Dan Dempster is looking to provide this terrible violation of essential freedom right to a young man in distress in Los Angeles, CA as I write this. How many others have survived (or not survived) it?