Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Narconon and their Federal Tax Liens

I see that Narconon, one of several infamous scientology front groups is in the news again.

Narconon International dba Narconon Florida,Inc, just got busted for under-reporting payroll and not paying the IRS the appropriate payroll taxes in 2006.

I thought it was just an isolated case when I found that Narconon Georgia got busted for not paying appropriate payroll taxes earlier this year. Seems they too didn't have the money to pay it off, at least at the time I saw this:



Narconon Georgia got busted for the year 2007, as you can see here.

It's good to see is that the IRS is auditing Narconon payroll records. I suspect that there are more of these liens out there and more audits to come.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Scientology Front Group " Second Chance" Caught on Camera by Officials

You can't make this stuff up!

Nighttime shuttles clear rehab center
Second Chance blew last chance?
Last Edited: Wednesday, 24 Dec 2008, 11:40 PM MST
Created On: Wednesday, 24 Dec 2008, 11:40 PM MST
KRQE News 13 ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Reporter: Dave Bohman
Web Producer: Bill Diven
ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - Under cover of darkness Wednesday the troubled Second Chance rehab center mysteriously shuttled nearly 50 patients or inmates away from its facility just ahead of a deadline to explain who it's been housing....[..]


Digg It

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

The Miscavige Legal Statements – a study in Perjury, Lies and Misdirection


Here's a re-post of an important recent statement authored by Lawrence(Larry)Brennan, a former member and high ranking administrator of the Church of Scientology.

Whenever Larry posts, I listen because he's one of the most important witnesses to the deceptive corporate shenannagans played against the IRS by the Church of Scientology, L Ron Hubbard and David Miscavige. Here's his latest:

Operation Clambake Message Board [..] SME posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008

“The Miscavige Legal Statements – a study in Perjury, Lies and Misdirection” – Posting #10 – November 11, 2008

As covered in the first posting of this series, I am here listing a quote by David Miscavige in a legal document.

I. David Miscavige’s Quote:

From “DECLARATION OF DAVID MISCAVIGE” – Larry Wollersheim vs. Church of Scientology of Calfornia – 15 October 1999:

(link–http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/decl-miscavige-1999-09-24.html)

“33. During the late 1970's to 1980, while producing religious training films, as well as 1980 to his passing in 1986, while in seclusion continuing his research and writing, Mr. Hubbard lived away from his wife, Mary Sue. This point is important. While Mr.Hubbard was the Founder of the religion, he did not hold any corporate position. His role was the inspiration and Source of the religion's teachings. Mrs. Hubbard was the head of the Guardian's Office. As the Founder's wife she was, of course, held in high regard in the religion. The GO was, in fact, answerable to no one except those in the GO, and Mrs. Hubbard held the highest position in the GO”.

II. The truth about the subject matter quoted:

In the above quote Miscavige carefully chooses his words to try not to perjure himself. For example he talks of L. Ron Hubbard (“LRH”) living away from his wife and holding no corporate position. And, he says that MarySue Hubbard held the highest position in the Guardian’s Office (“GO”). What he carefully omits is the meaninglessness of these statements.

Corporate “on paper” control was never the real control used for any length of time within organized scientology. Although he did not hold corporate controls on paper then, that never stopped LRH in the slightest from ordering into and controlling all major sectors of organized scientology including the GO. Whether or not he physically lived with his wife had nothing to do with his ability to order into the GO yet Miscavige states that to mislead the reader into assuming the fact of their physical separation actually has some relevance to the issue of control of the GO. It does not.

While Mary Sue Hubbard was indeed in a senior position to the Guardian World Wide while she held a position entitled “Commodore’s Staff Guardian” (later to be renamed to “Controller”) she was not in fact the senior most person to run the GO. Miscavige’s statement that she held the highest position in the GO is misleading at best. The fact is that while LRH had no title as being over the GO, he was in fact the senior most person over the GO itself.

Mary Sue indeed gave many orders into the GO and oversaw many activities of the GO. But the policies that the GO was trained on and the major strategic orders to the GO were overwhelmingly by and from LRH. This includes many policies, “Guardian’s Orders” as well as many of the major GO plans, programs and orders.

I was a fully trained and interned Legal Staff Member within the Guardian’s Office with over 9 years of experience of legal under Hubbard, mostly within the GO. Between July 1976 and July 1981 I worked at the headquarters of the GO in East Grinstead in the UK known as GO World Wide. I can tell you that there were so many LRH orders, programs, plans, etc (and compliances to same) in those GOWW files that it took some 100 or so GOWW staff and students weeks to vet out them or remove them from GOWW files alone after the FBI had raided GO offices in the USA.

These showed years of LRH control of many GO activities.
In just the GO legal “corporate” area alone, LRH himself was deeply involved in major corporate evolutions and scams from the beginning and in fact directed the GO with respect to handlings for same throughout the history of the GO.

This included corporate matters where money was secretly funneled to Hubbard for years and goes right up to and through that actual corporate sortout in 1981-1983.

A few examples of LRH controlling corporate/legal GO matters from personal history include:

1) LRH being the one behind the mid 70s "Greater Churches of Scientology" plan that GO US was following to set up backup corporations for each "church" corporation in the mid 70s. This was so new corporations were ready to start in the event the IRS seized all assets of church corporations in the US via jeopardy assessment. LRH wrote then that the real assets of any org were its staff and contacts and not the cash, buildings, etc. so he instructed the GO to get ready with backup corporations that could be funded from financial sources outside of the IRS's reach if needed. (Note: the wildest thing really about "all the IRS problems" through the decades is that most stem, not from GO mishandlings, but from the abusive written or other policies of LRH himself including the millions of millions of dollars he insisted constantly inure to his own private benefit).

Again, LRH was causing the problems, not the GO. And, he was directing the GO to cover them up;

2) You can see documents from earlier posts on alt religion scientology by others seized in the FBI raids on "the church" showing Deputy Guardian USGO's telexes to LRH where LRH's approval was being gotten on funds to use to purchase the Fort Harrison Hotel in Clearwater. CSC (Church of Scientology of California) funds could be used and they would secretly go though a phony front corporation called "Southern Land Development and Leasing Corporation" (SLDLC). Hubbard was not only behind this but his approval was needed on anything major that the GO did involving this. I myself was on the first "SLDLC" mission in Savannah, Georgia where I and a "Commodore Staff Aide" were checking out the Savannah Country Club as a possible location for Flag when the ship came ashore. When that was given up as not practical, Florida was chosen and LRH himself had to approve it being Clearwater;

3) After the whole SLDLC/UCF (United Churches of Florida) scam blew up in Clearwater, I wrote a corporate program to stabilize "Flag" in Florida. It was LRH himself who wrote to me with his approval of what the program covered and asking me to get "Flag" a consumer's certificate of exemption there so that it could operate and not have to be considered as a business and have to charge sales taxes. I did that and complied to LRH;

4) In GOWW, LRH constantly had to approve major corporate structures and other legal actions. He had to approve CSC being used as the main corporation in the UK for a time (when it was thought CSC would be tax exempt in the US and that would be a good positioning for the UK);

5) LRH's were the orders I had to follow to set up the first WISE corporation in Liechtenstein (which we didn't use as LRH did not like the "Limited" in the name as he said that killed the PR for WISE);

6) I had LRH's own orders on Corporate Sortout Matters from the early 80s where he pushed first one team and then my own team to come up with legal solutions to mask his control of the organizations of scientology and gave his own instructions on how to brief the attorneys;

7) LRH's own orders were used for the actual corporate sortout
missions that put in such things as RTC, CSI, broke up CSC, etc.;

8 ) LRH’s orders were the ones followed to set up and get operational Scientology Missions International in a way to get great tax advantages and to try to avoid legal liabilities. A copy of one of his orders on this matter is contained in section 16 of my declaration from May 2008: http://evil.scientology.googlepages.com/crs.pdf

9) LRH continued to order us well into 1983 about all that and more.

I could give many, many more examples but the above are given to point out that it was LRH who controlled the GO back then, the legal actions it took and it was that same LRH who controlled it after the GO, despite all that Miscavige says to deny this.

Likewise Miscavige’s statement of LRH being in seclusion from 1980 to 1986 is equally misleading. Not only were his orders used in 1981 to help restructure organized scientology corporately but for much of the time that I was on the Watchdog Committee in 1982 and 1983 I received and complied to orders from LRH weekly covering major legal matters involving organized scientology, royalties, etc. At that same time LRH was ordering me on such matters, he was also ordering all of the other WDC members on matters involving the sectors they oversaw.

Miscavige frequently uses corporate veils to hide the real controls by saying people had no corporate authority and thus could not have controlled organized scientology. However to Miscavige and LRH before him corporate was only a cover to hide the real controls. I personally educated Miscavige and got his approval on much of organized scientology’s corporate structure and have personal knowledge of hundreds of examples of his violating it while he ran organized scientology when employed in Author Service in the early 1980s despite his statements under penalty of perjury to the contrary

A great deal more can be covered on what Miscavige lied about in the above quote but this information should be enough to make my point.

(III). My vote: “Perjury”, “Just a Lie” or “Simply Misdirection”

While Miscavige’s wordings in the above noted quote were designed to mislead the reader (“Misdirection”), together they paint a very false picture of the controls of the GO. So much so that IMHO David Miscavige committed Perjury in his above statement.

Comments from anyone who wants to give them on this thread will be welcome. I welcome both agreement and disagreement and suggest that those concerned vote for “Perjury”, “Just a Lie” or “Simply Misdirection” as they see fit.

Eventually I plan to post on my blog the top actual examples of David Miscavige’s greatest perjury, lies and misdirecting statements to deflect attention away from organized scientology’s misdeeds as voted on by the general public. It should be interesting.

If any others reading this thread may want to add in their own examples of the truth which may be even more relevant than my own, please feel free to do so.

The entire list of these postings as well as other series’ of postings I plan to make through this next year will be found on my blogspot: http://larrybren.blogspot.com/

Larry Brennan
My blog: http://larrybren.blogspot.com/ [..]
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?p=347801#347801
____________________________________________

Did David Miscavige commit perjury using lies and misdirection? From the above and from my own experience as a former longtime member of scientology, I say it's more than lies and misdirection. I say it's perjury.

~ Mary McConnell

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

The "Bail Out", The Scientology Entities and The Slatkin Ponzi Scheme 7 years Later.

The party's over. Consumers are way in over their head in debt and the financial markets are overstretched for having stretched the lending rules. When the cards begin to fall, confidence games are exposed. Multi-million dollar Ponzi Scheme prosecutions are up because wherever there is greed, there's the potential for fraud.



The history of the one of the world's largest ponzi schemes of 7 years prior, the Reed Slatkin Investment Club, included a lax SEC and hundreds of greedy investors with an abundance of money to invest. Many of the investors who benefitted from the scam included members of the Church of Scientology and the Church of Scientology itself. In then the end, those funds received in excess of contribution to the 'club'were deemed avoidable and recoverable as fraudulent transfers. This resulted in millions and millions of dollars in recoverable judgements against or settlement agreements with the Scientology entities and it's involved members and staff. It's not surprising to see the cult of greed, as Time Magazine called Scientology, involved in the receipt fraudulent transfers.What is surprising is how Scientology managed to keep this information from hittin g the front pages of the media in 2006.



Recent news is rife with Ponzi cases and convictions, where some investors made out like bandits while the rest lost every cent they invested. Among them is the the Tom Petters 3 billion dollar investment scam; the SEC vs. Hu case where the SEC just charged former Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu with "operating a $60-million Ponzi scheme in a civil lawsuit filed Monday in Los Angeles." . In another, a Fargo, ND insurance agent has been charged with 78 felony counts, for stealing over $5 million in client funds, engaging in fraudulent practices and selling unregistered securities. These are just a few of the multiple ponzi schemes that have emerged as we grapple with a collapsing economy build with to much greed and encompassed with weak regulations that invite fraud and deception.



7 years ago Business Week asked "The Reed Slatkin Case: Did the SEC Drop the Ball?" and here we are again today, asking the same question about a what appears to be a ponzi scheme of worldwide proportions.



When will America learn to protect itself and it's comsumers from such destructive scams? Sadly, greed seems to get in the way of logic time after time and history repeqts itself. There is a technology of sorts to understanding the mechanics of how one becomes a victim of fraud and how to avoid it ( for starters try Fraud Tech expert and author Dennis Marlock's site); Detecting deceptive trade practices is not as complicated as one would think. This applies to institutions as well as to individuals. Perhaps there are still more lessons to be learned from how the Reed Slatkin ponzi scheme case is being resolved in US Bankrupcy Court by one of the most skilled forensic accountants and persistent court appointed bankrupcy trustees in the US today, R. Todd Neilson.



On April 30th,2000 many hundreds of dismayed investors with a combined total of nearly $600,000,000 of invested funds were gathered together and informed that their "money manager", Earthlink co-founder and Scientology minister Reed Slatkin, was filing for bankrupcy. You would have thought that investors would have checked up on whether Slatkin even held a broker or advisor license but apparently none had or cared until it was too late. The shock had not yet set in when on May 11, 2001 the FBI and the Internal Revenue Service agencies raided Slatkin's home office in Santa Barbara, CA to locate assets and documentation that would become the subject of multiple subpoenas of people and organizations including the noninvesting Church of Scientology.



Slatkin was charged with, among other things, running a ponzi scheme: collecting monies from new investors to pay the "earnings" and prinicple owed to earlier investors. You see, most of the investors who gained high profits from the ponzi scheme just happened to be * scientologists or employees of the church of Scientology.



So, what has Scientology itself have to do with this and the recent "bail out" of financial institutions? Well many have likened the "bail out" to a pouring of money into an already out of control ponzi scheme and the Slatkin ponzi scheme was evidence of a church and it's members consistently benefitting financially at the expense of those who lost all they'd invested. Keep in mind that Scientology is the only religious organization in the United States whose members are allowed by the IRS to deduct as charitable contributions for all religious instruction fees and material costs, in violation of the first amendment. Despite that favored position, the
'chickens had finally come home to roost' on this Slatkin matter as bankrupcy trustee R. Todd Neilson persisted over the last 7 years in making sure the church, it's involved members along with a minority of nonscientologists who gained in this ponzi scheme are held responsible for repaying avoidable and recoverable fraudulent transfers of funds received directly or indirectly from Slatkin pursuant to US and CA state civil codes.



This was not an easy task by any means. Trustee Neilson had to deal with many of the ponzi scheme 'winners' who did not want to repay the favorited illegal gains received, despite the threat of adversarial rulings that would have raised the rate of interest due and had potential to refer cases for criminal charges. The court is still in hearings related to recovery of funds that will be split according to preset percentages amongst those who lost their investments or benefit because of the ponzi scheme.



Since the inception of this case and those related to it, much money has been recovered and there are multi-million dollar judgements on record and being pursued. But more than money was at stake here. To my knowledge, at least 2 relatively young defendent / scientologists died within weeks of each other while enduring the lengthy court process: businessman Ivan(Ike)KEZSBOM and attorney Michael KANANACK. Another scientologist, Arthur D Gordin aka Arlo Gordin, DC turned in his license and fled the country with his gains - over $4 million worth - refusing to pay back anything at all to the bankrupcy estate. And yet another, Anthony Hitchman and wife, are in the process of being busted for using other people to funnel undeclared income to and for himself.



Many of the investors were audited by the IRS because of discrepancies found or in bankrupcy cases filed by the investors themselves. Scientologist and former Grateful Dead manager Ron Rakow is currently in prison on tax fraud charges which resulted indirectly from the Slatkin case. Anthony Hitchman may well wind up in prison because the trustee has witnesses and evidence that he was funneling unreported income via friends and relatives while under bankrupcy to avoid paying on his Slatkin case judgements. All of these these people are Scientologists, Hitchman being one of the most influential and earliest devotees of founder L Ron Hubbard's cult.



On September 25, 2006, the Church of Scientology entities, including it's front groups Narconon, Criminon, Celebrity Center, CCHR as shown below, agreed to pay back $3,500,000 after the church refused to allow the trustee access to theit'd financial records to effect a better settlement. The church was not cooperating in supplying financial records and documents and Trustee Neilson knew a hyperlitigious company when he saw one and he negotiated what he could use to settle the case rather than tying the case up in court. Neilson has faired alot better than the many who have challanged this controversial organization in a court setting. The former FBI forensic accountant is ever pesistent and discontented investors can be assured that Neilson will do all he can to recover the fraudulent transfers. Take a look at the links provided below for the individual PDF files and further information and documentation.



Lermanet.com 's Index of Fraud Slatkin-related files include names of Scientologists such as Arthur Hubbard ( son of Scientology founder L Ron Hubbard)former Grateful Dead manager and Jerry Garcia business partner Rakow, Anthony "Tony" Hitchman, former chiropractor to the stars, Arthur D "Arlo" Gordin (who fled the country rather than pay back his illicit gains), Rakows girlfriend, Denise Del Bianco, CoS = Church of Scientology, Joseph Mancuso and Christopher Mancuso of World Wide Telecommunications Corporation and Clear World Communications Corp, author James Monroe Justice who is still fighting having to repay his gains, along with attorneys John Coale & wife Greta Van Sustern (who quietly repaid their illegally gotten gains despite claiming they would fight it ), Michael & Anne Kananack, Rosser Cole et al, Joel Kreiner and wife Stina Hans, and Scientology attorney Helena K Kobrin, George W Murgatroyd III and spouse, James Q Fisher & spouse, who settled or were judged guilty and ordered to repay. These scientologists are among the many other scientologists considered themselves among the most ethical people on the earth because Scientology taught them they are entitled to anything they can get away with, as long as they don't get caught and it's Fair Game to anyone who opposes them.



The real victims of Slatkin's fraud where those who believed in his ministerial collar, his use of Scientology 'communication routines' and skill as a trained "counselor" ( which really is about using mild but consistent amounts of hypnosis to gain cooperation of the counselee ) and his association with Earthlink and the power that association implied. he was a con man and some of the players in his ponzi scheme were con men as well. Scientologist Ron Rakow, in particular, had a history of ripping people off, including Jerry Garcia, and yet Garcia never wiped his hands of him. It take a good deceptor to make something like that happen, and happen over and over again. Scientology gave Slatkin the means and methods of conning others and the connections to get away with it. In his ear was Ron Rakow, encouraging him to go for more and bringing more victims into the fold. Both are in prison. Will they be better people when they get out? That remains to be seen.



In the meantime, consumers need to get a grip on greed and stop allowing themselves to be conned by weakly regulated con men and institutions. Learn how fraud & deception works and consider what you have learned as you watch this worldwide recession unfold, wherever the cards may fall.



Lermanet/ Scientology related Fraud Files

YouTube Video: Reed Slatkin 1/3

YouTube Video: Reed Slatkin 3/3


Estate of Reed E. Slatkin U.S. Bankruptcy Court Central District of California Northern Division Case #: ND 01-11549RR
More on Ron Rakow



Esquire mag October 1, 2001, "An incredibly strange and complex tale involving Scientology, EarthLink, Hollywood, and this man, REED SLATKIN "



SlatkinFraud.com Early history of the Slatkin Fraud case with lots of earlier court documents.



~ Mary McConnell
formerlyfooled at yahoo dot com

Tags: Scientology, fraud, bail out, ponzi, Reed Slatkin, Tom Petters, Norman Hsu, DNC, Santa Barbara, CA, Narconon, Criminon, IAS Members Trust, Association For Better Living and Education, cult, con game, fraudtech.org, Dennis Marlock, Arnie Lerma

Thursday, September 18, 2008

HUMBLE EX MEMBER OF SCIENTOLOGY DESCRIBES HIS LIFE IN THE CULT

I was really touched by this short but powerful interview of neil, a former victim of the cult of Scientology:

EX MEMBER NEIL, TALKS ABOUT THE HORRORS WHEN HE WAS INVOLVED IN THE CULT IN MANCHESTER, ST HILL AND LOS ANGELOS. by Tony & Sue aka getbeckyout

PART ONE: Neil C Interview MANCHESTER, England


PART TWO: Neil C Interview MANCHESTER, England


It brought tears to my eyes. neil truly conveyed the problems & fear so many of us experienced before we left, when we left and after we left as we came upon the truth about Scientology.

I'm doing my part to get this around the internet so scientologists and
nonscientologists alike can see it. Pass it along. Thanks

Kudos to getbeckyout aka Tony & Sue, the parents trying to get their daughter Becky out of Scientology

Monday, August 25, 2008

Scientology is 'Clearing the Planet', One Unborn Child at a Time.

Did you know that the Church of Scientology is Anti-Family and orders their elite members to abort pregnancies or risk being made to leave the group they are dedicated a billion years of their lives to? Well, here is the video where the church spokesperson admits that Scientology does indeed force certain members to have abortions. Why? Well, they are in the business of 'clearing the planet'. In this case, one unborn child at a time.

Richard & Judy item on Scientology
Channel 4, Oct 11 2005 [British television]

This video details life inside Scientology 's elite corp called the Sea Organization including it's policy of compulsory abortions for female members of that elite corp.

Former Scientologist Astra Woodcraft is interviewed by Richard & Judy, along with a spokeswoman for the Church of Scientology in the UK, Janet Kenyon-Laveau. Woodcraft left the organization so she would not have to abort her child.

Kenyon-Laveau is forced to admit to this, that Scientology's Sea Organization is anti-family and pro-enforced abortion.



This is a priceless interview. Kudos to Astra Woodcraft and the 'Richard and Judy' show for tackling this so effectively.

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Scientology Caught Using Fair Game Tactics on Parents Trying to Reach Their Daughter, A Member of the Cult.

Meet Tony and Sue from Manchester England, peaceful protesters against the Church of Scientology. They are one of many families persisting to reach their THEIR CAPTIVE CHILDREN.

"We fight to get our daughter out of this mind control and money grabbing CULT." says Becky's parents, Tony and Sue. How do they fight? Using the sword of truth, and the tools of honor, decency and communication. What do they get back? Listen and find out:

TONY AND SUE v THE CULT Part 1


SCIENTOLOGY FAIR GAME explained:

"The term Fair Game is used to describe various aggressive policies and practices carried out by the Church of Scientology towards people and groups it perceives as its enemies."

See more Tony & Sue Videos:
getbeckyout videos at Youtube

~Mary McConnell
formerlyfooled at yahoo.com

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Church of Scientology and Los Angeles Police Dept caught violating civil rights laws.


Working in concert together, the Church of Scientology and Los Angeles Police Dept were caught once again violating civil rights of citizens. Makes one wonder if there is some kind of public corruption going on. Where is the FBI when you need them?


Here is the rest of his usenet article, which is worth repeating:

"The Church of Scientology gala event to celebrate the 39th anniversary of the Celebrity Center was an epic flunk and fail for the worlds’ most dangerous cult and totalitarian terror enterprise. It was also an epic win for Anonymous." wrote Graham E. Berry, attorney and advocate.

Cult leader David Miscavige was once “In Charge” of “Project All Clear,” a 1980s Scientology mission to eliminate all litigation and government investigations of Scientology so that L. Ron Hubbard could emerge from his hiding places and life on the lam. Twenty two years after the leading role of David Miscavige in the highly suspicious death of L. Ron Hubbard, Miscavige now needs his own Project All Clear. Anonymous is not going to let him have it. Anonymous does not forgive. It does not forget. It is epic. It will bring the Hubbard killers to great justice!

Before he died, Robert Vaughn Young gave me a copy of the first chapter of his never to be completed book “Who killed L. Ron Hubbard?” You can guess at the answer. http://tinyurl.com/647s4l

As I approached the Celebrity Center from Bronson Avenue/Hollywood Boulevard, a handicapped person (Mr. X) and I were excluded from progressing any further by the L.A.P.D. acting upon the instructions of Scientology Rev. Lyn Farny.


He is the corporate secretary of the Church of Scientology International. Rev Lyn Farny is also in charge of the OSA Internet operations and projects (including their “black ops” and Religious Freedom Watch). It was Lyn Farny who was conceived the Eugene Ingram February 1994 trip to New York to blackmail and bribe Robert Cipriano into signing the perjured Cipriano declaration, which Cipriano recanted after (Scientology lawyers and staffer ) Kendrick Moxon, Samuel D. Rosen, Gerald Chaleff, Gerald Feffer, Barbara Reeves and others had used it to engage in multiple frauds upon multiple courts and the State Bar in order to “utterly destroy” me. Had they not done that I would be doing other professional things at this time. However, Farny, Ingram and Moxon “pulled it in” for Scientology and here I am, as the direct result of what they did.

Now, 14 years later, Farny was personally directing that my civil rights continue to be violated by refusing to allow me to peacefully walk up the east sidewalk of Bronson Avenue to Franklin Avenue. As I approached, Farny spoke with an L.A.P.D. officer who moved to intercept me on the sidewalk. (see photos, below)



The time was 7.05 PM on August 9, 2008 and Officer 17038 blocked me from walking any further up Bronson Avenue. “You can’t walk up here dressed like that” the officer said to me.” I was stunned. “What do you mean I can’t walk up here dressed as I am?” The officer said, “You cannot walk up this street wearing that T shirt with those words on it and carrying that picket sign.” By now I was dumbfounded. Had the L.A.P.D. learned nothing from its encounters with the federal judges during the 2000 Democrat Party convention in Los Angeles?

In addition, words on a T shirt can be constitutionally protected speech. My T shirt read “Scientology Kills!”



Meanwhile, the peace officer allowed another man to access the sidewalk. “Officer,” I said. “Why are you letting that man walk on the side walk but not me?” The officer eplied, “Because I have already taken his ID and he lives in the neighborhood.”

I said, “Officer, you didn’t even ask me for my ID.”

As I began to walk away I noted the badge numbers of several of the other LAPD officers who were manning the barricades with Scientology’s Internet black-ops meister Rev. Lyn Farny. I deposed him once. The officers included #15034 and #8796. I was asked if I wanted to see the street closure permit. “Yes please.”

“You can see the Los Angeles City Councils own applicable codes, conditions, permit forms and procedures online at http://bsspermits.lascity.org/spevents/ ( removed by LAPD)

For example, the form PETITION (for commercial areas) REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE PERMIT expressly provides that “[t]he closure, when granted, will be for the exclusion of vehicles only. Admission to an event may not be charged; and the public at large may not be denied access to any portion of any street except in cases of emergency. A 20-foot emergency lane shall be provided on all streets within the said closure at all times.” Emphasis added.



“Clearly, the Scientology enterprise, including Kendrick L. Moxon, Esq., and Ed Parkin, are working with the Los Angeles Police Department (and perhaps officials within the Los Angeles City Council Bureau of Street Services) to blatantly violate both federal law and the City of Los Angeles own municipal codes and permits. These violations have been occurring on at least two days of every week for about 24 consecutive weeks.”


You can read the language yourself: http://bsspermits.lacity.org/spevents/ ( removed by LAPD ) or http://tinyurl.com/22otpg . At the bottom of the page click on each of the three types of petition forms that the Church of Scientology signed and that is incorporated by law into the final permit. ( all removed by City of Los Angeles)

One of the L.A.P.D. officers who denied me access to all portions of Bronson Avenue for a number of blocks showed me a copy of the permit.

It was number 20081447. You can click on it here: or http://tinyurl.com/65a9tb
or
http://bsspermits.lacity.org/spevents/public/menu_public.cfm?ref_no=20081447
On the left side of the page click on each of the three pages of the permit.


I took a look at the permit and said, “Officer, the permit may say total or full closure but the permit is issued subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code and they are set forth on the permit application form itself. A total or full closure only applies to vehicle traffic. The law states that the public at large … may not be denied access to any portion of any street except in cases of emergency. Just because Farny and Scientology says the words full closure on a piece of paper mean you can exclude whoever you wish, it still doesn’t mean that the L.A.P.D. can just ignore the law and engage in civil rights violations.” [Also see Section 5733.11, Obstruction of Exits and Aisles]. The peace officer responded politely, “We only do what we are told by them (meaning Scientology security) and the permit says they can do it.” I walked off saying, “But the permit does not permit you to violate the law by excluding me from walking up Bronson Street.” And this officer was acting under color of law.

After six months of these civil rights violations the Los Angeles City Council should be reserving millions of dollars for potential legal defense and damages costs arising from the conduct of the L.A.P.D. and the Department of Building Services! However, what can you expect when Gerald Chaleff is the L.A.P.D. attorney? He was formerly one of the Church of Scientology’s leading and highest paid defense attorneys. Now he is in charge of R.I.C.O. compliance, or criminal racketeering avoidance, under a judicial consent decree entered into between the Los Angeles Police Department and the United States Department of Justice. The fox is in charge of the chickens!



By the way, I will soon commence local and state political action to stop these street closure illegalities and civil rights violations. Perhaps it is time to also seek a recall election to oust scientology shill Eric Garcetti? At the same time we might also consider petitioning for L. Ron Hubbard Way to return to its former name of Berendo Street. The name change to L. Ron Hubbard Way was the result of public corruption. Interestingly, the Department of Justice recently disbanded its public corruption unit in Los Angeles.

As a result of the Scientology enterprise and the L.A.P.D. excluding the handicapped Mr. X and me from any access to any portion of Bronson Avenue between Carlos Avenue and Franklin Avenue, we had to walk nearly a mile around and across the Hollywood Freeway in order to reach our desired destination of the Mayfair Market corner at Franklin and Bronson.

As we were walking along the deserted back streets we came across a parking lot. As you will see from the album cover picture (URL below), there was an L.A.P.D. mobile command vehicle and six other vehicles. Most cars had two officers already sitting in the car and they were ready to swoop on the 32 protestors peacefully exercising their first amendment rights, against an organization deemed a global terrorist group and racketeering enterprise by most of the European and other western nations. Later we would observe at lease two dozen Los Angeles Police Department Officers, over a dozen other L.A.P.D. patrol cars and motor cycles, an L.A. Fire Department truck and several dozen private investigators, some with their own vehicles and many with cameras.

There were also photographers (and sharp shooters?)positioned on the roof tops and terraces of the Scientology Celebrity Center. All this because of 32 young partying picketers. No wonder the New York City Police and Washington, DC police love policing the Anonymous pickets.

“Even though the crazy scientologists are calling us out very five seconds for nothing, dealing with Anonymous is fun. Much more fun than dealing with other protestors, like the World Trade Organization and anti-war protests.”

However, despite the overwhelming police presence to cope with 32 young protestors, a handful of jaded scientology celebrities and a few hundred scientology deep pockets, a white van illegally parked on a corner and beside a fire hydrant could not be moved.

Why? It obscured the view of Anonymous picketers as the few hundred scientology event patrons turned their vehicles and limos right from Franklin Avenue. I was present when a number of unsuccessful telephone complaints were made over five hours. Even the dispatch officers were amazed that parking enforcement had not arrived to tow away the violating vehicle.

Finally one dispatcher suggested that the callers file an official complaint on Monday morning. Mr. X spoke to an officer about it several times. “We’ve tried to get it moved,” he responded. Mr. X was not placated. “With all these dozens of police officers, police cars and police motor cycles here that old party van would be towed within five minutes if you wanted it gone.” Clearly, Scientology public corruption was at work.


I am increasingly convinced that there is a supernatural law of karma and light, and that what goes around comes around. I saw that again last night, not only with Lyn Farny reviving a statute of limitations, but also with the fecal matter that was spewing off the Celebrity Center stage and into the Los Angeles sewers. Indeed, one of the Scientology event speakers sounded a lot like David Miscavige. After his tirade against the suppressives, the street sewers really blocked and backed up, a fleet of L.A. City Sewer Department pumping trucks quickly arrived, and Operation BS Cleanup was under way.


While the sewerage cleanup was going on the keynote speaker was heard and seen addressing the several hundred scientology supporters. They would shortly be pressured to pay over even more money to “shatter suppression” through the funding of even more civil rights and R.I.C.O. violations by the Scientology enterprise and OSA. The keynote speaker was the Attorney-General for the State of Utah!

There cannot have been more than 3-500 scientologists at this event. Few of them appeared to be real celebrities. The Celebrity Center grounds were expensively and lavishly decorated with props, bunting, stages and sound equipment (which broadcast in blatant breach of Articles Five and Six of the Municipal Code (amplified sound and general noise). Even at $600 a plate the event must have been a huge financial, public relations and morale flunk. The scientology publications unit will have to use Photoshop again!

I did enjoy meeting our Anonymous brothers and sisters from San Diego and elsewhere and I really look forward to picketing with them in San Diego before the end of summer. Let’s make August 16 and 17 another epic global picket. The Scientology enterprise is crumbling. Now it is on to really expose W.I.S.E. and its members, Narconon, Criminon, Applied Scholastics and all of the other scientology false front groups.




Despite multiple calls over four hours LAPD and the LA City Council refuse to move the van.




Here is the URL to Mr. Berry's photographs of both the July 19, 2008 Washington, DC march and the August 9, 2008 Celebrity Center 39th Anniversary picket:

Monday, August 11, 2008

How Scientology Narconon et al Apply Hypnotic Manipulation

Here's how Scientology and it's front groups like Narconon, New Life Recovery Services, Social Betterment Development Co dba SBDC New Life San Francisco among others apply hypnotic manipulation:


Learn Science experiments at 5min

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Who says Narconon isn't Scientology? Narconon Psych Waiver

Who says Narconon isn't Scientology? Just read the Narconon "illegal PC" Waiver:



The person who was made to sign this had been in detox for a week and does not even recall signing it. It was faxed over by VISA to the mother in her dispute to get her money back from being ripped off.

The reason the person was made to sign it was that he/she had at one time been prescribed Lexipro, having taken 4 pills over a 4 day period. Period.

To Scientology and Narconon, it's ok to discriminate against anyone having taken any amount of 'psych' medication.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Why isn't Narconon Being Investigated by the State of Georgia?

Patrick W Desmond died while under the care of Narconon of Georgia died while under the "care" of narconon of georgia. A candlelight vigil for him was held in July.

Candlelight Vigil for ex narconon patient

It probably would not have happened if the State of Georgia DHR Regulatory Agency had been doing it's job, but it wasn't. There were previous violations that appeat to have been shoved under the rug. How did Narconon get away with these violations from the State of Georgia and remain in operation?

Here is what is on record for Sept 2006 and April 2007. Notice the lack of explanation between the first report and the second.

Georgia Department of Human Resources, Office of Regulatory Services State Form
Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction
Inspection begin date 9/12/2006 Inspection end date: 9/13/2006

Name of Provider or Supplier
NARCONON OF GEORGIA
5688 PEACHTREE PARKWAY #B1
NORCROSS, GA 30092

Inspection Results
N 0000 Initial Comments

At the time of the follow-up to the relocation and licensure survey completed May 16, 2006, it was determined that Narconon of Georgia Outpatient Program remains out of compliance with Chapter 290-4-2, Rules and Regulations for Drug Abuse Treatment and Education Programs. Previously cited deficiencies remaining out of compliance were N311, N901, N1003, N1400, N14002, N1405, N1503 and N1504. The following new deficiencies cited were N911, N1008, N1303, N1403 and N1408. N 0311 290-4-2-.03(l) Definitions

In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and phrases set forth herein shall mean the following: ...

(l) "Outpatient Drug Treatment Program" means a non-residential program staff by professional and paraprofessional persons that provides drug treatment or therapeutic services, primarily counseling and other supportive services for drug dependent persons, and is not classified as an ambulatory detoxification program or
Specialized Day Treatment Program.

This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Based on program description, client records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility does not meet the definition of an outpatient drug treatment program due to the provision of detoxification services to clients, nor does the facility meet requirements for licensure as a program that includes detoxification due to the facility practice of employing exercise, sauna,
vitamins, minerals and other supplements exceeding the Institute of Medicine recommendations, potentially placing clients' health at risk. Findings were:
The facility submitted an updated application, dated September 13, 2006 for a new license. The program modality request on the application was for outpatient treatment services.

A review of the facility's program description reflected that the facility did not engage in any type of medical detoxification, but further identified that the objective of the program was to assist the client in post-acute withdrawal and rid the body of drug residuals and toxins. The program regimen, in the program description, includes a physical process of withdrawal from toxins and drugs though exercise, sauna, and nutritional supplements. The program description did not specify the amounts of vitamins, minerals, oils, and other supplements, and the extent of the exercise and sauna that were routinely implemented as a part of the purification phase of the detox treatment.

The program used L. Ron Hubbard's "Clear mind-Clear Body" as the protocol for Step 2 of the program, the purification phase. Review of step 2: The Narconon New Life Detoxification Program" directed the program clients though a physical regimen to include: running or walking to increase circulation, monitoring the client's vital signs, using various amounts of liquids, nutrition (in the form of vitamins and supplements) and the sauna to rid the client's body of drug residuals and toxins.
Even though the facility no longer has the sauna located at the facility it continues to prescribe the amount of time the client should stay in the sauna, exercise, and the amount of vitamins, minerals, oils, and other supplements.

Twelve of 12 sampled client records (client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) reviewed on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, had no documentary evidence of a physician's order dictating the amount and frequency of chemicals and other supplements prescribed for each client in the purification phase. All 12 sampled records lacked documentary evidence of continued medical oversight to include assessments or laboratory test if required, depending on the clients' changing needs. The client records also revealed that the client files lacked daily
vital signs and exercise times.

The client records also confirmed that the client still discusses the information filled out on the "daily report form" with the facility. The record also revealed that the facility still prescribed vitamins, minerals, oils, and other supplements which far exceeds the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA).

Review of client admission requirements still indicates that as part of the admission agreement, the clients sign waivers that agree to hold the Narconon program and its affiliates harmless from any and all liability which may arise out of or related to any action of failure to act during the program outlined in the program description. Furthermore, the clients agree to knowingly accept
the risk for any physical, mental, emotional or spiritual damages of any kind that results from participation in the sauna/exercise program and the program's related vitamin and supplement regime that exceed the Institute of Medicine's Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA).

It was determined that the practices of the facility exceed the services allowed in an outpatient drug treatment program, the detoxification program failed to meet accepted standards, and the program description and application failed to accurately designate the ASAM level at which services are provided.
This rule was previously cited on May 16, 2006.

N 0901 290-4-2.09(2) Administration
Program Description. A licensed program shall develop and implement written policies and procedures that describe the range of treatment and services provided by the program and must specify which American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) levels of care will be offered. Such policies and procedures shall describe how identified treatment and services will be provided and how such treatment and services will be assessed and evaluated. A program description must show what services are provided directly by the program and what treatment and services are provided in cooperation with available community or contract resources. The program description shall be reviewed at least annually and updated when treatment or services change.

This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on a review of the program description, and the program policies and procedures, it was determined the program description did not sufficiently describe the range of treatment and services provided for all clients. The findings were:
The program description specified Narconon of Georgia functioned at an (The American Society of Addiction Medicine) ASAM I level. this level is a outpatient treatment program that does not include a detoxification program. The submitted program description including provided policies and procedures, did not specify the amount of excessive vitamins, minerals, oils, other supplements, and the extent of exercise and sauna time that were routinely implemented as a part of the purification phase of the treatment. The program used L. Ron Hubbard's "Clear Mind-Clear Body" as the protocol for Step 2 of the program, the purification phase.

The facility as of 7/15/2006 no longer does this phase at the facility location, but still does not have the policies and procedures describing the training, qualification and responsibilities of the
staff supervising the purification phase, and how the process would be assessed and evaluated. This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.

N 0911 290-4-2-.09(7) Administration
A program shall maintain written records for each employee and the administrator. Each individual file shall include:
1. Identifying information such as name, address, telephone number, emergency contact person(s);
2. A ten year employment history or a complete employment history if the person has not worked ten years and at least two reference checks prior to employment;
3. Records of applicable licenses, health requirements, and educational qualifications as required by these rules;
4. Date of employment;
5. The person's job description or statements of the person's duties and responsibilities;
6. Documentation of training and orientation required by these rules;
7. Any records relevant to the employee's performance including at least annual performance evaluations; and
8. For programs serving children, the results of criminal record checks obtained from a law enforcement agency.
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on staff interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate personnel records on the only medical doctor on the staff roster (employee #14).

Findings were:
A list of staff requested from the administrator included one medical doctor. The Narconon of Georgia Organization Chart also referred to the same medical doctor.
No staff record was provided after repeated request for the medical doctor's file from the administrator.
The administrator provided the program's staff schedule and the staff roster that gave a brief synopsis of each staff member. The medical doctor was not on the staff schedule or staff roster from May 2006 through September 2006, even though the same medical doctor is listed on the March 6, 2006 application.

On 9/12/2006 at 2:30 p.m. the administrator was informed of this finding and did not produce any further documentation for the only medical doctor on staff.
N 1003 290-4-2-.10(4) Staffing The medical responsibility for each client will be vested in a licensed physician who oversees all medical services provided by the program. Physician assistants or nurse practioners may be utilized to the extent allowed by state practice acts.
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Based on records review and client and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a licensed physician to ensure medical oversight for all client services provided by the program resulting in potential harm for all clients. Findings were:

On day one of the survey, the administrator confirmed at 10:41 a.m. that the sauna was removed from the program, however, client interviews revealed that the facility continued to use L. Ron Hubbard's "Clear Mind-Clear Body" as the protocol for Step 2 of the program purification phase. Review of step 2: The Narconon New Life Detoxification Program" directed the program clients though a physical regimen to include: running or walking to increase circulation, monitoring the client's vital signs, using various amounts of liquids, nutrition (in the form of vitamins and
supplements) and the sauna to rid the client's body of drug residuals and toxins.
Six of six (#8, #16, #17, #18, #19, and #20) client interviews conducted 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006 reported completing step 2 (sauna):

-#8 admitted 8/1/2006 used the sauna at a person's house;
-#16 admitted 5/28/2006 used the sauna at Narconon;
-#17 readmitted to the program 6/2/2006 used the sauna at a doctor's office;
-#18 admitted 1/23/2006 used the sauna at a doctor's office;
-#19 admitted 7/14/2006 used the sauna at a person's house;
-#20 admitted 5/28/2006 at Narconon; # 20 revealed that they removed the sauna about 2 months
ago (July 2006) and the clients were directed to use the sauna at Ballys, L.A. Fitness, The Church of Scientology, staff members apartment complex and then a person's house. Twelve of twelve sampled client records (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) reviewed on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, had no documentary evidence of continued medical oversight to include assessments or laboratory test if required, depending on the clients'changing needs because of the modality of treatment used in the purification phase.

Even though the facility no longer has the sauna on the premises, the program continues to prescribe the amount of time the client should stay in the sauna, exercise, and the amount of vitamins, minerals, oils, and other supplements.
The client records also confirmed that clients still discuss the information filled out on the "daily report form" with the facility. The records also revealed that the facility staff was still prescribing vitamins, minerals, oils, and other supplements which far exceeds the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) with potential risk to the clients.

Review of client admission requirements still indicates that as part of the admission agreement, the clients sign a waiver that agreed to hold the Narconon program and its affiliates harmless from any and all liability which may arise out of or related to any action of failure to act during the program outlined in the program description. Furthermore, the clients agree to knowingly accept the risk for any physical, mental, emotional or spiritual damages of any kind that results from
participation in the sauna/exercise program and the program's related vitamin and supplement regime that exceed the Institute of Medicine's Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA)

When queried on September 13, 2006 at 2:00 p.m., the clinical director of the program confirmed that the documentation was not adequate. When asked for further information, the clinical director did not add any additional information.
This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.

N 1008 290-4-2-.10(7)(b) Staffing
Additional training consisting of a minimum of thirty (30) clock hours of training or instruction shall be provided annually for each staff member who provides treatment services to clients. Such training shall be in subjects that relate to the employee's assigned duties and responsibilities.

This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on a review of employee records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 30 hours of training for five of eight sampled employees who worked at the facility for more than a year (employees #1, #3, #5, #11, and #12). The findings were:

Seven of eight personnel records did not have documentation of thirty hours minimum of any treatment related training.
Employee #1 had 18 hours of training.
Employee #3 had 1 hours of training.
Employee #5 had 10 hours of training.
Employee #11 had 4 hours of training.
Employee #12 had 0 hours of training.
During an interview on 9/12/2006 at 2:00 p.m. the administrator was informed of this finding and was unable to confirm that the employees went to training or produce further documentation showing evidence of training on the above mentioned employees' records.

N 1303 290-4-2-.13(1)(b)1. Client Referral, Intake, Assess, Adm
... Physical Assessment. At the time of admission, a preliminary physical assessment shall be done, at a minimum, by a Registered Nurse or Licensed Practical Nurse under the supervision of a RN or physician and shall include documentation of vital signs, appropriate screening tests for STD and TB, urine drug screens, a determination of whether the client requires a physical or psychiatric examination by a physician according to established protocols, and laboratory tests as clinically indicated. Laboratory tests required upon admission for clients in each program modality, in addition to those tests required for all modalities, will be determined by the
programs and documented in their policy and procedures as to the criteria used to determine and specify which minimum lab tests are to be done for each modality. Other lab tests may be required by the physician as clinically indicated. If an examination by a physician is indicated, arrangements shall be made for such an examination as appropriate. The assessment shall also include circumstances leading to admission, mental status, support system, psychiatric and medical history, risk assessment for HIV, history of use of drugs, including the age of onset, duration, patterns, and consequences of use, family history of drug use, route of administration and previous treatment. If a client has been referred for treatment from another facility, the results of a physical examination and laboratory tests from the other facility may be documented and used to assess physical status,
provided that such physical examination was done within six months of admission, and there has been no significant change in the physical status of the client. Further assessments or laboratory tests may be required depending upon the modality of treatment needed or the client's changing condition. ...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Based on client record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to do a complete client physical assessment at the time of admission for four of 12 sampled client records (clients #1, #4,#12, and #16)Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed :
Four of 12 sampled records (#1, #4, #12, and #16) did not have documentation of a urine drug screen being done at the time of admission. A baseline urine screen test is required to determine specific drug use and to have a guide for measuring improvement or effectiveness, on random future drug screens, in the clients' drug treatment program.

Client # 1's admission date was 5/6/2006 and the urine drug screen test was done on 5/30/2006.
Client # 4's admission date was 7/31/2006 and the urine drug screen test was done on 8/2/2006.
Client #12's admission date was 7/27/2006 and the urine drug screen test was done on 8/4/2006.
Client # 16's admission date was 7/14/2006 and the urine drug screen test was done on
8/24/2006.
When queried on September 13, 2006 at 2:00 p.m., the clinical director of the program confirmed that the documentation was not adequate. No further information was available.

N 1400 290-4-2-.14 Individual Treatment Planning
A program must develop and implement a complete individualized treatment plan for each client. Such treatment plans shall be modified and updated as necessary, depending upon the clients' needs.
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on client record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a complete individualized treatment plan for 12 of 12 sampled clients
(client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:
Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed that all 12 sampled client records did not have individualized treatment plans. All 12 sampled clients had the same three pre-printed objectives written in their treatment plans. The objectives were:
1. Regular attendance at Narconon of Georgia.
2. Provide negative drug screens.
3. Participate in training routines.
During an interview on September 13, 2006 at 3:00 p.m., the administrator was informed of this finding and admitted the facility did not individualize client treatment plans.
This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.
N 1402 290-4-2-.14(b) Individual Treatment Planning Complete Treatment Plan. The complete treatment plan must be comprehensive, formulated by a multi-disciplinary team with the input of the client, approved by the clinical director, completed within thirty days from admission, and shall contain sufficient information about the client's expected treatment[.]...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on client record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a complete treatment plan which was approved by the clinical director for nine of 12 sampled clients (clients #1, #3, #4, #6, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:
Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed that nine of 12 sampled clients'records did not contained documentation showing evidence that the clinical director approved the treatment plan.

During an interview on September 13, 2006 at 4;30 p.m., the administrator was informed of this finding and was unable to produce documentation showing evidence that the clinical director approved the treatment plan.

This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.N 1403 290-4-2-.14(b)1. Individual Treatment Planning Complete Treatment Plan. The complete treatment plan [shall include]: ...
1. Descriptions of the client's problems and needs; ...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on client record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a complete treatment plan which includes a description of the clients' problems and needs for 12 of 12 sampled clients (client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16).

Findings were:
Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed that all 12 sampled clients' records contained the list of abused drugs (example: methadone, cocaine, etc.) and did not contain the descriptions of the clients' problems.
During an interview on September 13, 2006 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator was informed of this finding and was unable to produce documentation showing the clients' problems and needs in the clients' treatment plans.
N 1405 290-4-2-.14(b)3. Individual Treatment Planning
Complete Treatment Plan. The complete treatment plan [shall include]: ...
3. The interventions and services that the program will provide to help the client achieve the individual goals and
desired outcomes; ...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on client record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop treatment plans which state the interventions and services the program will provide to help the clients achieve the individual goals and desired outcomes, for 12 of 12 sampled clients(clients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:

Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed that all 12 sampled clients did not have treatment plans which stated the interventions and services the program will provide to help the client achieve the individual goals and desired outcomes. The clients had interventions like "client will sign in/out at Narconon of Georgia one time daily for 60 days."

During an interview on September 13, 2006 at 4:00 p.m., the administrator was informed of this finding and confirmed that the treatment plans did not state the interventions and services the program will provide to help the client achieve their goals. This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.

N 1408 290-4-2-.14(c) Individual Treatment Planning
Progress Notes. A program shall document the services received by the client and document chronologically observations of the client's clinical course of treatment which includes the client's response to treatment and progress towards achieving individual goals and desired outcomes. Progress notes shall be documented by the
staff members assigned primary responsibility for the client's care, and shall be legible and recorded in the client's plan. Progress notes shall be recorded as applicable;

1. at the end of each shift in the client's medical record for residential detoxification programs; or
2. following any contact with a client undergoing ambulatory detoxification or narcotic treatment; or
3. at least weekly for substance abuse treatment residences; or
4. daily for day treatment programs; or
5. whenever there are face-to-face contacts with the client for outpatient drug treatment programs; or
6. whenever the client is observed to engage in a behavior which may effect a change in the treatment plan.
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on client record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to
document the services received by the client in progress notes for 12 of 12 sampled clients
(client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:
Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006 revealed, that the notes in the clients'records did not document, chronologically, observations of the clients' clinical course of treatment which included the clients' response to treatment and progress towards achieving individual goals and desired outcomes.
Interview with the administrator on 9/12/2006 at 2:30 p.m. confirmed that the progress notes were incomplete.

N 1503 290-4-2-.15(c) Medications
Medications. ... Such policies and procedures shall include the following:
(c) Unless self-administered, all medications are administered by a physician, physician's assistant, or nurse. ...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on review of client and employee records, and a statement overheard, it was determined that the facility failed to have medication administered by a nurse for 12of 12 sampled clients
(client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:
Review of client records on 9/12/2006 and 9/13/2006, revealed that the clients' records did not have any documentation that the vitamins and minerals were dispensed by a nurse. The clients'daily report forms and interviews with clients revealed that the clients are being given vitamins and minerals as a part of their daily regimens. At least one of the twelve sampled clients stated that he/she was on medication prescribed by a physician.

On 9/12/2006 at 2:00 p.m. the surveyor overheard that the staff needed the key to the safe so they could get a clients' medications. There was no nurse at the facility to dispense medications on 9/12/06.
This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.
N 1504 290-4-2-.15(d) Medications
Medications. ... Such policies and procedures shall include the following: ...
(d) Any medications prescribed, administered or self-administered under supervision are documented on an individual medication administration record that is filed with the individual treatment plan, unless maintained as a clinical record at the client's bedside or in the medication room in a residential detoxification setting. The record must include:
1. Name of medication;
2. Date prescribed;
3. Dosage;
4. Frequency;
5. Route of administration;
6. Date and time administered; and
7. Documentation of staff administering medication or supervising self-administration. ...
This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:
Based on review of client records, it was determined that the facility failed to document and maintain prescribed medication as a clinical part of the client records for 12 of 12 sampled clients (client #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16). Findings were:
Review of 12 of 12 sampled clients, participating in the sauna/exercise program, revealed that the clients did not have documentation of prescribed medication as part of their clinical records.
This rule violation was previously cited on May 16, 2006.
Page 14 of 14


TO THIS:

Inspection Results
As of: Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Georgia Department of Human Resources,
Office of Regulatory Services State Form
Statement of Deficiencies
and Plan of Correction
Inspection begin date
Inspection end date:
4/24/2007
4/25/2007
Name of Provider or Supplier
NARCONON OF GEORGIA
Street Address, City, State Zip Code
5688 PEACHTREE PARKWAY #B1
NORCROSS, GA 30092

N 0000 Initial Comments
At the time of the licensure survey, it was determined that Narconon of Georgia, was in substantial compliance with Chapter 290-4-2, Rules and Regulations for Drug Abuse Treatment and Education Programs. The following deficiencies were cited.
N 1500 290-4-2-.15 Medications If a program administers medications, written policies and procedures for prescriptions, administration andsecurity of medications shall be established and implemented. This Requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Based on facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish written policies and procedures for the administration and security of medications administered as part of the detoxification program.

Findings were:
Review of facility policy and procedures revealed no documented evidence of written policies and procedures for the administration and security of medications (vitamins and minerals)administered during the detoxification program.
Interview on 4/25/2007 at 9:30 a.m. with the facility executive director confirmed that the facility did not have established policies and procedures for the administration and security of medications.
Page 1 of 1
___________________

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Noelle North, Scientology & Subway Sandwiches

Over at RoanOC's YouTube Channel we find one of the top 10 damning videos documenting the truth about the Church of Scientology, it's prejudices and it's "celebrity" members to hit the internet this year. Roan writes:

Noelle North, Scientology & Subway Sandwiches

"Here is Noelle North implementing Scientology's "Jim Crow Law" brand of bigotry in Los Angeles. Noelle has tried to bar Anonymous with their little kids from coming into Subway Sandwiches for a bite to eat. "

I might add that Subway seems to be unwilling to face the ugliness of this matter. Subway refused to preserve their video tape of the incident. However, this videotape posted by RoanOC shows that the sign was indeed taped inside the store window, contrary to the official response.



Category: News & Politics
Tags: Subway Noelle North Scientology Anonymous protests civil rights Roan

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Scientology and it's Dangerous Front Groups

Recent Scientology Related Deaths

There have been two known recent deaths of Scientology front group program participants. One was a Narconon 'student' the other was a Criminon 'student'. Both were on the Hubbard's drug rehabilitation steps when they died. Both were loved and lost their lives at the hands of scientology practices. Both were situations of preventable negligence. Both are being investigated.

THE DEATH OF PATRICK W. DESMOND



July 11 marked the one month anniversary of the negligent and avoidable death of a well loved guy named Patrick "Rico" Desmond who died while under the supervision of Narconon of Georgia while on their rehab program. A candle light vigil service was held and video taped in front of the Church of Scientology of Georgia to recognize this terrible loss:



We are awaiting the autopsy but you can read what is known about this situation here and you can find out more about Patrick at his memorial site here

'STUDENT' COMMITS SUICIDE DURING CRIMINON DRUG REHAB DETOX

CODY BATES hanged himself at the San Francisco SBDC New Life Center Criminon facility on August 27, 2008. He'd been admitted to the facility on August 24th and began detox the next day. During the first day of detox, he had been administered medication with known side effects that included suicidal ideation to help facilitate the detox. Cody's mother thought he was under medical care and asked SBDC New LIfe Staff to provide 24 hr suicide watch of Cody because of statements he made to staff indicating he might commit suicide. The staff promised to keep a watchful eye but did not follow through and Cody was found on the 27th to have committed suicide. Apparently there was no medical personnel at the facility either.

Here is legal complaint filed by the victim's mother. I hope she sues the hell out of them:


Cody's mother is suing for negligence and wrongful death among othere things, and rightfully so. Her lawyer has been informed of the fact that the facility is not licensed by CA ADP despite the Association for Better Living
and Education (ABLE) press release about this place ( one of 5 or so 'facilities' operated in Single Room Occupancy Hotels in the City of San Francisco.)

Over at the Suppressive Person Defense League I found a story about this scam from scientology's front group coordinator called ABLE:

"The center has also been granted their license as a drug and alcohol recovery center by the California State Department of Drug and Alcohol. It now operates at an average of 50 students on the program at a time, and the center is still expanding — now having control of over 200 beds throughout 4 hotels in the area." http://www.able.org/news/

Here is their current website: http://www.newlifecentersf.org
Director and scientologist Richard Prescott owns http://SOMANEWLIFECENTER.Org

This is CLEARLY a Scientology program, incorporating the NarCONon drug rehab with the Criminon ' LIfe Skills.

Not surprisingly, neither San Francisco New Life Center, SOCIAL BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY or SBDC New Life are licensed by the California Alcohol and Drug Program, despite promoting that they are via the Facility locator at the federal governemnt site SAMHSA

Global Locator - ABLE International
San Francisco New Life Center...E-mail: info@somanewlifecenter.org. Criminon
www.able.org/contact/global-locator/?groups=criminon

Global Locator - Criminon Groups Around the World
...San Francisco New Life Center..info@somanewlifecenter.org
www.criminon.org/contact/global-locator.php

Richard Prescott is the main culprit in running this large scale detox program without a license. He also reported falsely to the federal facility locator site that it was licensed by ADP. He's currently being sued along with SBDC and related parties. May Cody Bates rest in peace.

BEWARE OF "NEW LIFE CENTER"
Social Betterment Development Company ( legal name). Clear Mind Services, SOMA New Life, SBDC New Life Center, and New Life Center of San Francisco

Social Betterment Development Company

Contracts to SOCIAL BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT Veterans Administration
(FY 2000-2007) ( contains all identifiers)

Best Vendor Name SOCIAL BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT
Best Vendor Name Type Vendor Name
Vendor Enabled f
Vendor Location Disable Flag f
Vendor Address Line 1 290 7TH ST
Vendor Address City SAN FRANCISCO
Vendor Address State CA: California
Vendor Zip Code 941034003

http://www.usaspending.gov/fpds/fpds.php?psc_cat=G&fiscal_year=2007&parent_id=202412&sortby=u&datype=T&reptype=r&database=fpds&detail=4&submit=GO

2006
http://www.fedspending.org/fpds/fpds.php?fiscal_year=&parent_id=260906&sortby=u&datype=T&reptype=r&database=fpds&detail=4&submit=GO


SBDC New Life Center registered with SAMHSA:

Facility No. Name Address Phone Distance Maps
1 SBDC New Life Center
1080 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 255-7434 0.00 miles Map It!
Primary Focus: Substance abuse treatment services
Services Provided: Substance abuse treatment, Halfway house
Type of Care: Residential long-term treatment (more than 30 days)
Forms of Payment Accepted: Self payment, Private health insurance

Intakes: (877) 300-7044x1 (415) 255-7434x1
Website: http://www.newlifecentersf.org
http://dasis3.samhsa.gov/PrxResults.aspx?&GAD2=1080+Folsom+St&GAD3=San+Francisco%2c+CA+94103-4022&GCITY=San+Francisco&GSTATE=CA&GZIP=94103-4022&GAD4=USA&DSN=MapPoint.NA&LOC=37.777095%3a-122.407427&IC=37.777095%3a-122.407427%3a32%3a1080+Folsom+St&NR=10&DBR=1&FC=&FCT=And&island=&AD2=1080+Folsom+St&CITY=San+Francisco&STATE=California&ZIP=&c2=&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c7=&detail=1

Clear Mind Services

WEBSITES:

NEW LIFE CENTER San Francisco
www.newlifecentersf.com

San Francisco New Life Center

( ABLE shows email site which is not up but is registered: somanewlifecenter.org)

San Francisco New Life Center
1082 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94103 USA
Phone: (415) 255 - 7434
Fax: 415) 255 - 7415
E-mail: info@somanewlifecenter.org

www.able.org/contact/global-locator/?groups=criminon

You can see where the email address name is linked here
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=somanewlifecenter&btnG=Search

Google Search Results 1 - 10 of about 1,040 for "San Francisco New Life Center".
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22San+Francisco+New+Life+Center%22&btnG=Google+Search

LOCATIONS:

290 7th St seems to be an administrative address for Richard Prescott, who runs all this. That address is used only as that, not a location for services on all legal papers personally and related to New Life legal entities. It is a single family home.

There are over 5 locations where services are promoted or have phone numbers:

1080 Folsom St San Francisco, CA 94103
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%28415%29+431-3733&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%221080+Folsom+St%22+San+Francisco&btnG=Search
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=1080+Folsom&city_zip=San+Francisco&state_id=CA&localtime=survey
http://clearmindservices.org/page17.html

Clear Mind Services

http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=clearmindservices.org&prog_id=godaddy

http://discoverandrecover.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/alternative-to-meds-center-experiences-growth-and-improvement/

1082 Folsom St San Francisco, CA 94103

Clear Mind Services, John Spaw, Dir New Life, Richard Prescott, M & S Management, SOMA Cafe
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=1082+Folsom&city_zip=San+Francisco&state_id=CA&localtime=survey
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReversePhone?full_phone=415-863-7522&localtime=survey
Clear Mind Services
http://www.usdirectory.com/Rehabilitation-centers/California/San-Francisco/6214980300-1.htm
http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C2082088

180 Lexington st San Francisco, CA 94110 (415) 255-7434
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=180+Lexington+St&city_zip=San+Francisco&state_id=CA&localtime=survey

221 7th St San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 558-1513

New Life Center 221 7th St San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 558-1513
http://www.usdirectory.com/Rehabilitation-centers/California/San-Francisco/6214980300-2.htm

http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=221+7th+St&city_zip=San+Francisco&state_id=CA&localtime=survey

New Life Center 221 7th Ave Apt 4 San Francisco, CA 94118 (415) 558-1513
http://www.yellowpages.com/info-LMS54161217/New-Life-Center/maps

formerly Gina's Hotel 221 7th St San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 558-1513
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-hotel-5149246-gina_s_hotel-i

34 Sixth St, Apt 501 San Francisco, CA 94103-1662

Whitepages Result matching "(415) 558-1513"
Seneca Hotel:
New Life Center work
34 Sixth St, Apt 501
San Francisco, CA 94103-1662
(415) 558-1513 Type: Land Line
Provider: Pacific Bell
Location: San Francisco, CA

http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReversePhone?full_phone=415-558-1513&localtime=survey
http://www.sfhsa.org/files/Human_Services_Commission/VIIHTenderloinSRO121604.pdf

Whitepages Matching Results for (415) 255-7434
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReversePhone?full_phone=415-255-7434&localtime=survey